| Line 1: | Line 1: | 
| − | '''<h3>LID opportunities in parks</h3>''' | + | '''<h3>LID opportunities in parks</h3>'''  [[File:Example.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|The bioretention area installed at O’Connor Park | 
|  | + | in Mississauga is part of a stormwater management system | 
|  | + | that treats parking lot runoff prior to discharging to a local | 
|  | + | wetland. (Source: CVC)]] | 
|  | + |   | 
|  | Parks range from simple parcels of municipal property to |  | Parks range from simple parcels of municipal property to | 
|  | complex outdoor recreational facilities that include parking, |  | complex outdoor recreational facilities that include parking, | 
| Line 6: | Line 10: | 
|  | be a source for runoff (referred to as a ‘source area’). These |  | be a source for runoff (referred to as a ‘source area’). These | 
|  | areas should be targeted when introducing LID in your park. |  | areas should be targeted when introducing LID in your park. | 
| − |   | + | <br><br> | 
|  | '''<h4>Targeting hard surfaces</h4>''' |  | '''<h4>Targeting hard surfaces</h4>''' | 
|  | Hard surfaces like parking lots and internal driveways are the |  | Hard surfaces like parking lots and internal driveways are the | 
| Line 19: | Line 23: | 
|  | clean and more closely match the natural water balance. |  | clean and more closely match the natural water balance. | 
|  | On municipal park properties, hard surfaces are usually |  | On municipal park properties, hard surfaces are usually | 
| − | located adjacent to pervious areas such as lawns, gardens or naturalized areas. [[File:Example.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|The bioretention area installed at O’Connor Park | + | located adjacent to pervious areas such as lawns, gardens or naturalized areas. This makes an ideal location for a LID | 
| − | in Mississauga is part of a stormwater management system
 |  | 
| − | that treats parking lot runoff prior to discharging to a local
 |  | 
| − | wetland. (Source: CVC)]]
 |  | 
| − | This makes an ideal location for a LID |  | 
|  | retrofit. Where grading allows, you can construct bioswales |  | retrofit. Where grading allows, you can construct bioswales | 
|  | and bioretention areas in these green areas to pre-treat water |  | and bioretention areas in these green areas to pre-treat water | 
|  | prior to infiltration. |  | prior to infiltration. | 
| − | 
 |  | 
|  | You can also design parking surfaces and internal roadways |  | You can also design parking surfaces and internal roadways | 
|  | as infiltration systems using permeable pavement. This retrofit |  | as infiltration systems using permeable pavement. This retrofit | 
| Line 38: | Line 37: | 
|  | storm sewers. They encourage infiltration from hard surfaces |  | storm sewers. They encourage infiltration from hard surfaces | 
|  | and can be used to convey water to other LID features. |  | and can be used to convey water to other LID features. | 
|  | + | <br> <br> | 
|  | + | '''<h4>Accepting drainage from off-site areas</h4>'''  [[File:Example1.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|Urban parkettes may look small, but they have | 
|  | + | the potential to treat a large surface area of road. Typical ratios | 
|  | + | of impervious drainage area to bioretention range from 5:1 to | 
|  | + | 15:1. (Source: CVC)]] | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| − | '''<h4>Accepting drainage from off-site areas</h4>'''
 |  | 
|  | Does municipally owned land drain into your retrofit site? If |  | Does municipally owned land drain into your retrofit site? If | 
|  | so, this is an opportunity to provide stormwater controls for |  | so, this is an opportunity to provide stormwater controls for | 
| Line 49: | Line 52: | 
|  | roads activities, including winter maintenance and potential |  | roads activities, including winter maintenance and potential | 
|  | roadwork, will affect the operation of LID practices in the park. |  | roadwork, will affect the operation of LID practices in the park. | 
| − |   | + | <br><br> | 
| − | '''<h3>Inter-municipal transfer of funds</h3>''' | + | '''<h3>Inter-municipal transfer of funds</h3>''' Integrating LID practices into the municipal stormwater | 
| − | Integrating LID practices into the municipal stormwater |  | 
|  | management framework may change how municipal funds are |  | management framework may change how municipal funds are | 
|  | managed. Traditional stormwater management maintenance |  | managed. Traditional stormwater management maintenance | 
| − | resources and funds may have to be transferred to   | + | resources and funds may have to be transferred to a more landscape-based stormwater management maintenance program. Instead of infrequent but expensive stormwater management pond sediment removal operations, time and | 
| − | [[File:Example1.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|Urban parkettes may look small, but they have
 | + | resources will be spent on more frequent but inexpensive maintenance projects including pruning and weeding bioretention practices or sweeping permeable pavement. | 
| − | the potential to treat a large surface area of road. Typical ratios
 | + | Municipalities generally have the required staff and infrastructure within departments (e.g. arborist and horticulturalists in parks departments) to manage the maintenance of LID measures; however, funding this maintenance may require a transfer of funding and additional | 
| − | of impervious drainage area to bioretention range from 5:1 to
 | + | training.   | 
| − | 15:1. (Source: CVC)]]
 | + | The federal Gas Tax Fund (GTF) is another funding option for | 
| − | a more landscape-based stormwater management maintenance | + | funding LID retrofits. This is a federal transfer that provides | 
| − | program. Instead of infrequent but expensive stormwater | + | long term funding for municipalities to build and revitalize | 
| − | management pond sediment removal operations, time and | + | public infrastructure. Up to 30% of municipalities yearly GTF | 
| − | resources will be spent on more frequent but inexpensive | + | allotment can be used towards stormwater management. | 
| − | maintenance projects including pruning and weeding | + | <br><br> | 
| − | bioretention practices or sweeping permeable pavement. | + |   | 
| − | Municipalities generally have the required staff and | + | '''<h3>Source Areas</h3>'''  [[File:Example3.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|The road surface (left) contributes significantly | 
| − | infrastructure within departments (e.g. arborist and | + | more stormwater pollutants than the parkland area (right). To | 
| − | horticulturalists in parks departments) to manage the | + | achieve maximum watershed benefit a designer could consider | 
| − | maintenance of LID measures; however, funding this | + | accepting runoff from this external area. (Source: CVC)]] | 
| − | maintenance may require a transfer of funding and additional | + | The LID option that best fits your site will depend what types | 
| − | training. | + | of source areas are present. Types of source areas include: | 
|  | + | • Active use area | 
|  | + | • Passive use area | 
|  | + | • Pedestrian walkway | 
|  | + | • Internal driveway | 
|  | + | • Parking lot | 
|  | + | On park sites, pollution prevention is often associated with | 
|  | + | changes to operations and maintenance practices and has | 
|  | + | not been included in Table 3.3.1. An aerial photo of a park | 
|  | + | with each of these source areas accompanies Table 3.3.1. | 
|  | + | Options and implementation strategies for a few of these | 
|  | + | source areas will give you some ideas for your park site. | 
|  | + | {| class="wikitable" | 
|  | + | |colspan="9" style="text-align: center;|'''[[LID Options for Parks]]''' | 
|  | + | |- | 
|  | + | | Source area || Permeable pavement || Bioretention || Enhanced grassed swales || Bioswales || Soakaways and infiltration chambers || Perforated pipe system || Landscape alternatives || Prefabricated modules | 
|  | + | |- | 
|  | + | | Active use area ||style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|* ||style="text-align: center;| o ||style="text-align: center;| o | 
|  | + | |- | 
|  | + | | Passive use area ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** | 
|  | + | |-style="text-align: center;| | 
|  | + | | Pedestrian walkway || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| * || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|o | 
|  | + | |- | 
|  | + | | Internal driveway || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|o ||style="text-align: center;| * | 
|  | + | |- | 
|  | + | | Parking lot ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|** | 
|  | + |   | 
|  | + | |- | 
|  | + | !colspan="3" style="background:cyan; color:black"| '''** Common option''' | 
|  | + | !colspan="3" style="background: orange; color: black"|'''* Possible option''' | 
|  | + | !colspan="3" style="background: brown; color: white"|'''o Unlikely''' | 
|  | + |  |} |