| Line 41: | Line 41: | 
|  | (Sortable, click headers) |  | (Sortable, click headers) | 
|  | |-   |  | |-   | 
| − | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white" rowspan = "2"|BMP type | + | !rowspan = "2"|BMP type | 
| − | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white" rowspan = "2"|Duration | + | !rowspan = "2"|Duration | 
| − | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white" colspan= "3"|Site characteristics | + | !colspan= "3"|Site characteristics | 
| − | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white" rowspan = "2"|Runoff reduction (%) | + | !rowspan = "2"|Runoff reduction (%) | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Native soil | + | !Native soil | 
| − | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|I/P ratio | + | !I/P ratio | 
| − | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Sump depth* | + | !Sump depth (m)* | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "VS 2015"> Van Seters, T. and Young, D., 2015, Performance Comparison of Surface and Underground Stormwater Infiltration Practices, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario"</ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||80 | + | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "VS 2015"> Van Seters, T. and Young, D., 2015, Performance Comparison of Surface and Underground Stormwater Infiltration Practices, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario"</ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||0.1; flow rate control||80 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Bioretention<ref name = "VS 2015"></ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||90 | + | |Bioretention<ref name = "VS 2015"></ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||0.1; flow rate control||90 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Permeable Pavement<ref>Van Seters, T. and Drake, J., 2015, Five year evaluation of Permeable Pavements, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||5 growing seasons||Silty clay||1:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||45 | + | |Permeable Pavement<ref>Van Seters, T. and Drake, J., 2015, Five year evaluation of Permeable Pavements, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||5 growing seasons||Silty clay||1:1||0.1; flow rate control||45 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Bioretention<ref>STEP study ongoing (2017)</ref>||1 growing season||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||83 | + | |Bioretention<ref>STEP study ongoing (2017)</ref>||1 growing season||Silty clay||10:1||0.1; flow rate control||83 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Bioretention <ref>Van Seters T and Graham C, 2014, Performance Evaluation of a Bioretention System, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||2 years||Silty clay||11:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||91 | + | |Bioretention <ref>Van Seters T and Graham C, 2014, Performance Evaluation of a Bioretention System, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||2 years||Silty clay||11:1||0.1; flow rate control||91 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Infiltration chamber<ref name = "DY 2013">Young D, Van Seters T, Graham, C, 2013, Evaluation of Residential Lot Level Stormwater Practices – tech brief</ref>||2 years||Sandy silt||20:1||Approx.: 1.2m||90 | + | |Infiltration chamber<ref name = "DY 2013">Young D, Van Seters T, Graham, C, 2013, Evaluation of Residential Lot Level Stormwater Practices – tech brief</ref>||2 years||Sandy silt||20:1||1.2 (approx.)||90 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"></ref>||2 years||Clayey silt||64:1||2 m||36 | + | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"></ref>||2 years||Clayey silt||64:1||2||36 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"></ref>||2 years||Clayey silt||155:1||2 m||16 | + | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"></ref>||2 years||Clayey silt||155:1||2||16 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Exfiltration trench<ref>SWAMP, 2005.  Performance Assessment of a Perforated Pipe Stormwater Exfiltration system, Toronto, Ontario, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||2 years||Clay to clay silt till over silty sand till||Approx: 7:1||0.65m||>90 | + | |Exfiltration trench<ref>SWAMP, 2005.  Performance Assessment of a Perforated Pipe Stormwater Exfiltration system, Toronto, Ontario, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||2 years||Clay to clay silt till over silty sand till||7:1 (approx.)||0.65||>90 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Infiltration trench<ref>SWAMP, 2002, Performance Assessment of a Swale Perforated Pipe Stormwater Infiltration System, TRCA, Toronto Ontario</ref>||2 years||Silty sand with clayey silt deposits||Approx: 4:1||1m||89 | + | |Infiltration trench<ref>SWAMP, 2002, Performance Assessment of a Swale Perforated Pipe Stormwater Infiltration System, TRCA, Toronto Ontario</ref>||2 years||Silty sand with clayey silt deposits||4:1 (approx.)||1||89 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Permeable pavement + bioretention<ref>CVCa</ref>||4 years||Clayey silt on silt till||Approx: 6:1||?||80 | + | |Permeable pavement + bioretention<ref>CVCa</ref>||4 years||Clayey silt on silt till||6:1 (approx.)||?||80 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
| − | |Bioretention<ref>CVCb</ref>||4 years||Silty clay||Approx.: 10:1||?||92 | + | |Bioretention<ref>CVCb</ref>||4 years||Silty clay||10:1 (approx.)||?||92 | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
|  | |Bioretention<ref>CVCc</ref>||4 years||Silty clay fill over clay till||30:1||?||72 |  | |Bioretention<ref>CVCc</ref>||4 years||Silty clay fill over clay till||30:1||?||72 |