Difference between revisions of "Curb cuts"
| Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) m | Jenny Hill (talk | contribs)  m | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Curb cuts are just one form of BMP [[Inlets|inlet]]. They are well suited to retrofit scenarios and to collect runoff from catchments with relatively gentle longitudinal slope, and/or a greater cross slope.    | + | <poem> | 
| + | Curb cuts are just one form of BMP [[Inlets|inlet]].   | ||
| + | They are well suited to retrofit scenarios and to collect runoff from catchments with relatively gentle longitudinal slope, and/or a greater cross slope.    | ||
| This might be the local topography of a parking lot or a piece of parkland? | This might be the local topography of a parking lot or a piece of parkland? | ||
| As this inlet width is directly proportional to longitudinal slope; the required curb cut increases rapidly on steeper roads. | As this inlet width is directly proportional to longitudinal slope; the required curb cut increases rapidly on steeper roads. | ||
| + | </poem> | ||
| ==Sizing== | ==Sizing== | ||
Revision as of 15:29, 31 October 2017
Curb cuts are just one form of BMP inlet. 
They are well suited to retrofit scenarios and to collect runoff from catchments with relatively gentle longitudinal slope, and/or a greater cross slope.  
This might be the local topography of a parking lot or a piece of parkland?
As this inlet width is directly proportional to longitudinal slope; the required curb cut increases rapidly on steeper roads.
Sizing[edit]
To completely capture linear flow travelling along a gutter perpendicular to a curb inlet, the inlet must be of width::
Where:
- WT is the width of the inlet for complete capture (m),
- Q is the design flow perpendicular to the inlet (m3/s)
- S0 is the longitudinal slope ratio
- n is Manning's 'n' (between 0.012 and 0.016 for concrete, depending on surface treatment), and
- Sx is the cross slope ratio (typically between 0.015 and 0.04)
Where the intention is to capture only a proportion of the flow, the ratio of flow entering the curb inlet may be calculated::
Where:
- Rc is the proportion of flow entering the curb cut, and
- W is the available curb cut width (m)
Where the curb cut width is constrained and a greater flow into the BMP is desired, the effective cross slope may be increased by adding a depressed apron.
The proportion of water entering the bioretention cell under these flow conditions would be::
48% of the 0.08 m3/s (i.e. 0.038 m3/s) would enter the bioretenteion cell through the inlet as designed.
Curb cuts gallery[edit]
- This curb cut has been sawn into existing concrete as part of a retrofit. Note the temporary (erosion log) and permanent stone erosion control measures in place. Mississauga Road, ON. 
- Curb cut used as a controlled overflow route from permeable pavements to a bioretention facility with monitoring well, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, Newmarket, ON. 
- Curb cut into a bioretention facility in Brown Deer, WI. Stone is used to reduce erosion around the inlet area. Photo credit: Aaron Volkening 
- Stone lined inlet at IMAX site in Mississauga 
- The grading around this inlet prevents flow in the correct direction. i.e. from the pavement onto the grass. Not too critical in this example, as the surface is permeable pavements. 
- Curb cut into a rain garden on a green street in Newmarket, ON. 







