| Line 60: | Line 60: | 
|  | |style="text-align: left;" |Building || * || * || * || ** || ** || * || ** || o || o || ** |  | |style="text-align: left;" |Building || * || * || * || ** || ** || * || ** || o || o || ** | 
|  | |} |  | |} | 
| − | 
 |  | 
| − | 
 |  | 
| − | 
 |  | 
| − | 
 |  | 
| − | 
 |  | 
| − | Large-scale projects require significantly more effort, budget,
 |  | 
| − | and staff than small-scale projects. Large-scale LID retrofits
 |  | 
| − | include:
 |  | 
| − | * Bioretention
 |  | 
| − | * Enhanced grass swales
 |  | 
| − | * Bioswales
 |  | 
| − | * Perforated pipe systems
 |  | 
| − | * Permeable pavement
 |  | 
| − | * Soakaways
 |  | 
| − | * Infiltration chambers
 |  | 
| − | * Rainwater harvesting (excluding rain barrels)
 |  | 
| − | * Prefabricated modules
 |  | 
| − | * Green roofs
 |  | 
| − | 
 |  | 
| − | Consider a large-scale project if your municipality or
 |  | 
| − | department would like to be a leader in sustainability. Large-scale
 |  | 
| − | projects are often highly visible and attract more public
 |  | 
| − | attention. Large-scale projects may also be the only solution
 |  | 
| − | to site-specific challenges. For example, if site infrastructure
 |  | 
| − | is at risk as a result of urban flooding, LID practices that detain
 |  | 
| − | large volumes of runoff and encourage infiltration are the
 |  | 
| − | most viable LID options.
 |  | 
| − | Before starting a large-scale retrofit project, consider the
 |  | 
| − | following distinctions that set these retrofits apart from small-scale
 |  | 
| − | projects.
 |  | 
| − | 
 |  | 
| − | ===Integration with capital works programs===
 |  | 
| − | 
 |  | 
| − | Most large-scale LID retrofits must function with existing
 |  | 
| − | site infrastructure, such as storm sewers, catch basins,
 |  | 
| − | and pavement systems. The construction of large-scale
 |  | 
| − | LID practices often requires these systems to be removed,
 |  | 
| − | exposed, or replaced. The best time for this type of project to
 |  | 
| − | occur is when an infrastructure replacement or rehabilitation
 |  | 
| − | project is already planned.
 |  | 
| − | 
 |  | 
| − | When LID retrofits are worked into other construction
 |  | 
| − | projects, such as parking lot repaving, or grading or drainage
 |  | 
| − | improvements, there can be substantial cost savings.
 |  | 
| − | Whether big or small, every municipality spends relatively
 |  | 
| − | large sums of money and substantial time planning for
 |  | 
| − | major capital projects. This includes redevelopment of public
 |  | 
| − | building and spaces. Many communities who have undertaken
 |  | 
| − | retrofits recognize that even if a relatively small portion of the
 |  | 
| − | project funds goes towards LID retrofits, they can retrofit large
 |  | 
| − | impervious surfaces and avoid new stormwater management
 |  | 
| − | infrastructure projects17.
 |  | 
| − | 
 |  | 
| − | Municipal facility rehabilitation is typically forecast well in
 |  | 
| − | advance of the project. Parking lot paving is typically worked
 |  | 
| − | into municipal budgets based on expected life cycle and
 |  | 
| − | observed wear. As such, funds may be set aside prior to
 |  | 
| − | the project planning phases. Long-term forecast budgets
 |  | 
| − | may also be available for site revitalizations or expansions.
 |  | 
| − | These budget forecasts provide opportunities to compare the
 |  | 
| − | capital and life-cycle costs and benefits of the conventional
 |  | 
| − | construction project and LID retrofit.
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | [[Category:Planning]] |  | [[Category:Planning]] |