| Line 1: | Line 1: | 
| − | {|class="wikitable" | + | '''STEP are conducting a review of performance for many BMP types throughout 2018. This content will be updated shortly.'''  | 
|  | + |   | 
|  | + | {|class="wikitable sortable" | 
|  | |+ Performance of bioretention with internal water storage<ref>Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater. Water. 2014;6(4):1069-1099. doi:10.3390/w6041069.</ref> |  | |+ Performance of bioretention with internal water storage<ref>Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater. Water. 2014;6(4):1069-1099. doi:10.3390/w6041069.</ref> | 
|  | |-   |  | |-   | 
| Line 6: | Line 8: | 
|  | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Media depth (cm) |  | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Media depth (cm) | 
|  | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Internal water storage depth (cm) |  | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Internal water storage depth (cm) | 
| − | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|I/P* | + | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|I/P ratio | 
|  | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Runoff volume reduction (%) |  | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Runoff volume reduction (%) | 
|  | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|TSS reduction (%) |  | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|TSS reduction (%) | 
| Line 28: | Line 30: | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
|  | !North Carolina<ref>Li H, Sharkey LJ, Hunt WF, Davis AP. Mitigation of Impervious Surface Hydrology Using Bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland. J Hydrol Eng. 2009;14(4):407-415. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(407).</ref> |  | !North Carolina<ref>Li H, Sharkey LJ, Hunt WF, Davis AP. Mitigation of Impervious Surface Hydrology Using Bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland. J Hydrol Eng. 2009;14(4):407-415. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(407).</ref> | 
| − | |loamy sand, 3% OM||120||60||20||>99||-||-||- | + | |loamy sand, 3% OM||120||60||20||99||-||-||- | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
|  | !rowspan="2"|North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Hunt WF. Bioretention Performance in the Upper Coastal Plain of North Carolina. In: Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2008:1-10. doi:10.1061/41009(333)95.</ref> |  | !rowspan="2"|North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Hunt WF. Bioretention Performance in the Upper Coastal Plain of North Carolina. In: Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2008:1-10. doi:10.1061/41009(333)95.</ref> | 
| Line 34: | Line 36: | 
|  | |- |  | |- | 
|  | |90||60||12||98||-||-||- |  | |90||60||12||98||-||-||- | 
| − | |} | + | |- | 
| − |   | + | !rowspan="2"|North Carolina<ref>Passeport E, Hunt WF, Line DE, Smith RA, Brown RA. Field Study of the Ability of Two Grassed Bioretention Cells to Reduce Storm-Water Runoff Pollution. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2009;135(4):505-510. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000006.</ref> | 
| − | <tr><td rowspan=2class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Passeport E, Hunt WF, Line DE, Smith RA, Brown RA. Field Study of the Ability of Two Grassed Bioretention Cells to Reduce Storm-Water Runoff Pollution. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2009;135(4):505-510. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000006.</ref></td>
 | + | |rowspan="2"|15% sand, 80% fines, 5% OM||60||45||68||-||-||54||63 | 
| − | <td rowspan=2class="text-center">15% sand, 80% fines, 5% OM</td>
 | + | |- | 
| − |         <td class="text-center">60</td>
 | + | |90||75||68||-||-||54||58 | 
| − |         <td class="text-center">45</td>
 | + | |}  | 
| − |         <td class="text-center">68</td>
 |  | 
| − |         <td class="text-center">-</td>
 |  | 
| − |         <td class="text-center">-</td>
 |  | 
| − |         <td class="text-center">54</td>
 |  | 
| − |         <td class="text-center">63</td>
 |  | 
| − |         </tr>
 |  | 
| − | <tr><td class="text-center">90</td>
 |  | 
| − |         <td class="text-center">75</td>
 |  | 
| − |         <td class="text-center">68</td>
 |  | 
| − |         <td class="text-center">-</td>
 |  | 
| − |          <td class="text-center">-</td>
 |  | 
| − |          <td class="text-center">54</td>
 |  | 
| − |          <td class="text-center">58</td>
 |  | 
| − |         </tr>
 |  | 
| − |     </table>
 |  | 
| − |   *Impervious/Pervious ratio, i.e. the area of catchment divided by surface area of the cell
 |  | 
| − | </table>
 |  | 
| − |   |  | 
| − |   |  | 
| − | ==References==
 |  | 
| − | <em><references /></em>
 |  | 
| − |   |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| − | <strong>For review</strong>
 | + | ===For review=== | 
|  | *http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0000876 (pollutants) |  | *http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0000876 (pollutants) | 
|  | *http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784413883.003 (maturation) |  | *http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784413883.003 (maturation) | 
| Line 70: | Line 50: | 
|  | *https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE%20THESIS%20FINAL.pdf (modified biomedia) |  | *https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE%20THESIS%20FINAL.pdf (modified biomedia) | 
|  | *http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/1/13/htm (cold climate) |  | *http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/1/13/htm (cold climate) | 
|  | + | ---- | 
|  | + | [[Category: Performance]] |