Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bioretention Design Guide"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 175%; height: 200px;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 175%; height: 200px;" | ||
| − | !style="background: | + | |- |
| − | !style="background: | + | !colspan="2" style="background:darkcyan"| |
| + | !colspan="6" style="background: cyan; color: black"|CANADA | ||
| + | !colspan="13" style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|United States | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Bioretention | + | !colspan="2" |[[Bioretention]] || CVC+TRCA (Factsheets-2010) || CVC-Construction Guide-2012 || CVC-Retrofit Guide-2014 || Toronto- 2016 || LID-SWM Guide 2010 || LID-Design Guide Edmonton- 2014 || New York State SWM Design Manual-2015 || Massachusets SW BMP-2013 || District of Columbia-SWM Guidebook-2010 || San Diego LID Handbook-2014 || Alabama LID Handbook-2013 || W. Virginia-SWM design guidance manual-2012 || Rhode Island-SW design & Installation Standards Manual-2012 || Pennsylvania-City of Philadelphia green St. design manual-2014 || Minnesota SW Manual-2017 || Tennessee-LID Development-SWM 2016 || Texas-LID Technical Guidance Manual-2013 || Oregon SWM Manual-2014 || Oregon State Univ. Fact Sheets-2011 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Filter media | + | !colspan="2"|Filter media Depth || 1-1.25 || || || 1-1.25 || 1-1.25 || 0.5-1.0 || || || || || || || || || >= 2.5 ft. || || || | |
|- | |- | ||
| − | + | !colspan="2"|Composition | |
| + | !colspan="19"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !|!|Topsoil|| || || || || || || 30-50% || 20-30 % || || || || 8-20 % || || || Table 1 & 2 (below) || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || sand || 85-88 % || Fine sand=0-17%, Coarse to medium sand=71-92 % || 85-88 % || 85-88 % || 85-88 % || 50-85 % || 50-70 || 40% || 85-88 % || 65% sand, 20% sand loam || 85-88 % || 70-88 % || 85-88 % || 50-80 % || || 70-85 % (sandy loam) || 85-88 % || 66% || 60% (sandy loam) | + | !| || sand || 85-88 % || Fine sand=0-17%, Coarse to medium sand=71-92 % || 85-88 % || 85-88 % || 85-88 % || 50-85 % || 50-70 || 40% || 85-88 % || 65% sand, 20% sand loam || 85-88 % || 70-88 % || 85-88 % || 50-80 % || || 70-85 % (sandy loam) || 85-88 % || 66% || 60% (sandy loam) |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Fines(silt and clay) || 8-12 % || 8-12 % || 8-12 % || 7-12 % || 8-12 % || 10-15% (silt),3-10% (clay), both combined, max 20% || clay < 5% || || 8-12 % || || 8-12 % || || 0-12 % silt, 0-2 % clay || Silt 40% , Clay 10% || || 10-20% (silt), max. 10% (clay) || 8-12 % || || | + | !| || Fines(silt and clay) || 8-12 % || 8-12 % || 8-12 % || 7-12 % || 8-12 % || 10-15% (silt),3-10% (clay), both combined, max 20% || clay < 5% || || 8-12 % || || 8-12 % || || 0-12 % silt, 0-2 % clay || Silt 40% , Clay 10% || || 10-20% (silt), max. 10% (clay) || 8-12 % || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || gravel || || || || || || || || || || || || || || 15% || || || || || | + | !| || gravel || || || || || || || || || || || || || || 15% || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Organic matter || 3-5 % || 3-5 % || 3-5 % || 3-5 % || 3-5 % || 5-10% || 5% || 30-40 % || 1-5 % || 2-5 % || 3-15 % || 3-5 % || 3-5 % || 2-10 % || || 5-10 % || 2-5 % || 33% || 40% | + | !| || Organic matter || 3-5 % || 3-5 % || 3-5 % || 3-5 % || 3-5 % || 5-10% || 5% || 30-40 % || 1-5 % || 2-5 % || 3-15 % || 3-5 % || 3-5 % || 2-10 % || || 5-10 % || 2-5 % || 33% || 40% |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || P-index value || 10-30 ppm || || || 12-30 ppm || 10-30 ppm || || || || 10-30 || || || || || || || || < 15 || || | + | !| || P-index value || 10-30 ppm || || || 12-30 ppm || 10-30 ppm || || || || 10-30 || || || || || || || || < 15 || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Soluble salts || || || || < 2.0 mmhos/cm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | + | !| || Soluble salts || || || || < 2.0 mmhos/cm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Cationic exchange capacity || > 10 meq/100 g || 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 5 meq/100 g || || || > 10 || > 5 || || > 10 || || || || > 10 || || || > 5 | + | !| || Cationic exchange capacity || > 10 meq/100 g || 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 5 meq/100 g || || || > 10 || > 5 || || > 10 || || || || > 10 || || || > 5 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || pH || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || || || || 6-8 || || || || 6-7 || 6-8.5 (WQ blend) || || 6-8 || || 5.5-7.5 | + | !| || pH || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || || || || 6-8 || || || || 6-7 || 6-8.5 (WQ blend) || || 6-8 || || 5.5-7.5 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Phosphorus || || || || || || 10-30 ppm || || || || || || || || || Table 1 & 2 (below) || || || || | + | !| || Phosphorus || || || || || || 10-30 ppm || || || || || || || || || Table 1 & 2 (below) || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Infiltration rate || > 25 mm/hr || > 25 mm/hr || > 25 mm/hr || > 25 mm/hr || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | + | !| || Infiltration rate || > 25 mm/hr || > 25 mm/hr || > 25 mm/hr || > 25 mm/hr || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Surface resistance || || || || <= 110 PSI || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | + | !| || Surface resistance || || || || <= 110 PSI || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Sub-surface resistance || || || || <= 260 PSI || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | + | !| || Sub-surface resistance || || || || <= 260 PSI || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Saturated hydraulic conductivity , mm/hr || || || || || || 25 min. || || || || || || || || || || || || || | + | !| || Saturated hydraulic conductivity , mm/hr || || || || || || 25 min. || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || P-Content || || || || || || || || || 10-30 || < 15 ppm || || 7-23 mg/kg || || || || || || || | + | !| || P-Content || || || || || || || || || 10-30 || < 15 ppm || || 7-23 mg/kg || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Compost (optional) || || || || || || 15-25% || || || || 15% || || || || || || || || || | + | !| || Compost (optional) || || || || || || 15-25% || || || || 15% || || || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Gravel | + | !colspan="2"|Gravel Storage |
| + | !colspan="19"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Void space ratio | + | !| |
| + | !| Void space ratio || 0.4 || || || || 0.4 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Depth | + | !| |
| + | !| Depth || min. 300 mm || || || min. 300 mm || min. 300 mm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Diameter(clear stone) | + | !| |
| + | !| Diameter(clear stone) || 50 mm || || || 50 mm || 50 mm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"|Pea gravel choking layer depth (mm)|| 100 || || || || 100 || 100 || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | diameter (mm) | + | !colspan="2"|Pea gravel diameter (mm)|| 3-10 || || || || 3-10 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Mulch | + | !colspan="2"|Mulch |
| + | !colspan="19"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Depth | + | !| |
| + | !| Depth || 75 mm || <=75 mm || || 75 mm || 75 mm || 70-80 || || || || || || || || || || || || || | ||
| + | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Overflow | + | !colspan="2"|Overflow invert above the filter bed surface || 150-250 || || || <= 250 mm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"|Monitoring Well |
| + | !colspan="19"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !| |
| + | !| Vertical perforated pipe diameter || 100-150 mm || 100-150 mm || || 100-150 mm || 100-150 mm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"|Monitoring Well |
| + | !colspan="19"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !| |
| + | !| Required when infiltration rate || < 15 mm/hr || || || < 15 mm/hr || || < 13 mm/hr || || || || || || || || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !| |
| + | !| Diameter || min. 100 mm(200 mm recommended) || min. 100 mm, 200 mm is recommended || || min. 200 mm || min. 100 mm(200 mm recommended) || 200 mm || || || || || || || || || 4 inches || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !| |
| + | !| Depth above the gravel storage layer || 100 mm || || || 100 mm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | ! |
| + | !| Available head beween the inflow point and the downstream stream drain invert || 1-1.5 m || || || || 1-1.5 m || || || || || || || Typical CDA 0.1-2.5 acres of 100% IP(<0.5 no underdrain), alternative to checking layer is needle punched non-woven geotextile || || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"|Contributing drainage area |
| + | !colspan="19"| | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !| | ||
| + | !|Typical || 100 m2 to 0.5 hectare || || || || 100 m2 to 0.5 hectare || || || || || || 0.5-2 acres preferred,max 5 acres,BR min. size 200 ft2 || || || || 5 acres || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !| |
| + | !|Maximum recommended || 0.8 hectare || || || || 0.8 hectare || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"|Setback from building Foundation(m) || 4 || || || 4 || 4 || 3 (clay), 5 (heavy clay) || || || || || || || || || see table 3 below || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"| (Impervious drainage/treatment facility) area || 5:1 to 15:1 || || || 5:1 to 15:1 || 5:1 to 15:1 || || < 5:1 loading ratio (DA to IA, DA 100% IP) || SA of BR 3 to 6% of CDA || || || sized at 5-8 % of IPCDA || BR SA 3-6% of CDA || || || CDA < 5 acres || CDA < 2.5 acres || CDA < 5 acres || || BR SA: 6-15 % of IP area |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"|Contributing Slope (%) || 1-5 || || || || 1-5 || || || || || || || || || || >1 % and < 33% || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"| Slope of the surface, % || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || <= 1% || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"| Water table depth || min. 1.0 m || || || || min. 1.0 m || > 1.8 || || || || || || || || || 3 ft. || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"| Outlet || || min. 100 mm above the bottom of the facility || || || || || || || || || || || || || Difference in elevation between inflow and outflow =4-6 ft (when underdrain is used) || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"| Maximum ponding depth above the filter bed surface || 150-250 mm || || || 250 mm || 150-250 mm || 350 mm || || || || || || || || || 18 inch || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"| Facilties receiving road runoff are not located within time of travel wellhead protection areas, year || 2 || || || || 2 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"| Drainage time of ponded water after the end of storm event , hr || || || || || 24 (48 recommd.) || < 48 (2 yr. design) || || || || || || || || || Max. 48 hr. || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"| Inlet design for non-point source-grass filter buffer, m || || || || || || 0.5-3.0 || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"| Surface area/Contributing drainage area, % || 10-20 % || || || || 10-20 % || 3.0-30 % || || || || || || || || || (5-10)%- min. 200 ft2 || || || || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"| Contributing impervious area || || || || || || < 4.0 ha. || ` || || || || || || || || || || || < 15000 ft2 || |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | !colspan="2"|Facility Flow Velocity |
| + | !colspan="19"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 14:58, 20 September 2017
| CANADA | United States | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bioretention | CVC+TRCA (Factsheets-2010) | CVC-Construction Guide-2012 | CVC-Retrofit Guide-2014 | Toronto- 2016 | LID-SWM Guide 2010 | LID-Design Guide Edmonton- 2014 | New York State SWM Design Manual-2015 | Massachusets SW BMP-2013 | District of Columbia-SWM Guidebook-2010 | San Diego LID Handbook-2014 | Alabama LID Handbook-2013 | W. Virginia-SWM design guidance manual-2012 | Rhode Island-SW design & Installation Standards Manual-2012 | Pennsylvania-City of Philadelphia green St. design manual-2014 | Minnesota SW Manual-2017 | Tennessee-LID Development-SWM 2016 | Texas-LID Technical Guidance Manual-2013 | Oregon SWM Manual-2014 | Oregon State Univ. Fact Sheets-2011 | |
| Filter media Depth | 1-1.25 | 1-1.25 | 1-1.25 | 0.5-1.0 | >= 2.5 ft. | |||||||||||||||
| Composition | ||||||||||||||||||||
| !|Topsoil | 30-50% | 20-30 % | 8-20 % | Table 1 & 2 (below) | ||||||||||||||||
| sand | 85-88 % | Fine sand=0-17%, Coarse to medium sand=71-92 % | 85-88 % | 85-88 % | 85-88 % | 50-85 % | 50-70 | 40% | 85-88 % | 65% sand, 20% sand loam | 85-88 % | 70-88 % | 85-88 % | 50-80 % | 70-85 % (sandy loam) | 85-88 % | 66% | 60% (sandy loam) | ||
| Fines(silt and clay) | 8-12 % | 8-12 % | 8-12 % | 7-12 % | 8-12 % | 10-15% (silt),3-10% (clay), both combined, max 20% | clay < 5% | 8-12 % | 8-12 % | 0-12 % silt, 0-2 % clay | Silt 40% , Clay 10% | 10-20% (silt), max. 10% (clay) | 8-12 % | |||||||
| gravel | 15% | |||||||||||||||||||
| Organic matter | 3-5 % | 3-5 % | 3-5 % | 3-5 % | 3-5 % | 5-10% | 5% | 30-40 % | 1-5 % | 2-5 % | 3-15 % | 3-5 % | 3-5 % | 2-10 % | 5-10 % | 2-5 % | 33% | 40% | ||
| P-index value | 10-30 ppm | 12-30 ppm | 10-30 ppm | 10-30 | < 15 | |||||||||||||||
| Soluble salts | < 2.0 mmhos/cm | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cationic exchange capacity | > 10 meq/100 g | 10 meq/100 g | > 10 meq/100 g | > 10 meq/100 g | > 10 meq/100 g | > 5 meq/100 g | > 10 | > 5 | > 10 | > 10 | > 5 | |||||||||
| pH | 5.5-7.5 | 5.5-7.5 | 5.5-7.5 | 5.5-7.5 | 5.5-7.5 | 5.5-7.5 | 6-8 | 6-7 | 6-8.5 (WQ blend) | 6-8 | 5.5-7.5 | |||||||||
| Phosphorus | 10-30 ppm | Table 1 & 2 (below) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Infiltration rate | > 25 mm/hr | > 25 mm/hr | > 25 mm/hr | > 25 mm/hr | ||||||||||||||||
| Surface resistance | <= 110 PSI | |||||||||||||||||||
| Sub-surface resistance | <= 260 PSI | |||||||||||||||||||
| Saturated hydraulic conductivity , mm/hr | 25 min. | |||||||||||||||||||
| P-Content | 10-30 | < 15 ppm | 7-23 mg/kg | |||||||||||||||||
| Compost (optional) | 15-25% | 15% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gravel Storage | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Void space ratio | 0.4 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Depth | min. 300 mm | min. 300 mm | min. 300 mm | |||||||||||||||||
| Diameter(clear stone) | 50 mm | 50 mm | 50 mm | |||||||||||||||||
| Pea gravel choking layer depth (mm) | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||
| Pea gravel diameter (mm) | 3-10 | 3-10 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mulch | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Depth | 75 mm | <=75 mm | 75 mm | 75 mm | 70-80 | |||||||||||||||
| Overflow invert above the filter bed surface | 150-250 | <= 250 mm | ||||||||||||||||||
| Monitoring Well | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Vertical perforated pipe diameter | 100-150 mm | 100-150 mm | 100-150 mm | 100-150 mm | ||||||||||||||||
| Monitoring Well | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Required when infiltration rate | < 15 mm/hr | < 15 mm/hr | < 13 mm/hr | |||||||||||||||||
| Diameter | min. 100 mm(200 mm recommended) | min. 100 mm, 200 mm is recommended | min. 200 mm | min. 100 mm(200 mm recommended) | 200 mm | 4 inches | ||||||||||||||
| Depth above the gravel storage layer | 100 mm | 100 mm | ||||||||||||||||||
| Available head beween the inflow point and the downstream stream drain invert | 1-1.5 m | 1-1.5 m | Typical CDA 0.1-2.5 acres of 100% IP(<0.5 no underdrain), alternative to checking layer is needle punched non-woven geotextile | |||||||||||||||||
| Contributing drainage area | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Typical | 100 m2 to 0.5 hectare | 100 m2 to 0.5 hectare | 0.5-2 acres preferred,max 5 acres,BR min. size 200 ft2 | 5 acres | ||||||||||||||||
| Maximum recommended | 0.8 hectare | 0.8 hectare | ||||||||||||||||||
| Setback from building Foundation(m) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 (clay), 5 (heavy clay) | see table 3 below | |||||||||||||||
| (Impervious drainage/treatment facility) area | 5:1 to 15:1 | 5:1 to 15:1 | 5:1 to 15:1 | < 5:1 loading ratio (DA to IA, DA 100% IP) | SA of BR 3 to 6% of CDA | sized at 5-8 % of IPCDA | BR SA 3-6% of CDA | CDA < 5 acres | CDA < 2.5 acres | CDA < 5 acres | BR SA: 6-15 % of IP area | |||||||||
| Contributing Slope (%) | 1-5 | 1-5 | >1 % and < 33% | |||||||||||||||||
| Slope of the surface, % | <= 1% | |||||||||||||||||||
| Water table depth | min. 1.0 m | min. 1.0 m | > 1.8 | 3 ft. | ||||||||||||||||
| Outlet | min. 100 mm above the bottom of the facility | Difference in elevation between inflow and outflow =4-6 ft (when underdrain is used) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum ponding depth above the filter bed surface | 150-250 mm | 250 mm | 150-250 mm | 350 mm | 18 inch | |||||||||||||||
| Facilties receiving road runoff are not located within time of travel wellhead protection areas, year | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Drainage time of ponded water after the end of storm event , hr | 24 (48 recommd.) | < 48 (2 yr. design) | Max. 48 hr. | |||||||||||||||||
| Inlet design for non-point source-grass filter buffer, m | 0.5-3.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Surface area/Contributing drainage area, % | 10-20 % | 10-20 % | 3.0-30 % | (5-10)%- min. 200 ft2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Contributing impervious area | < 4.0 ha. | ` | < 15000 ft2 | |||||||||||||||||
| Facility Flow Velocity | ||||||||||||||||||||