| Line 375: | Line 375: | 
|  | ==Places of worship== |  | ==Places of worship== | 
|  | [[File:Landforms of a place of worship.JPG|thumb|Source areas within a typical place of worship]] |  | [[File:Landforms of a place of worship.JPG|thumb|Source areas within a typical place of worship]] | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Each distinct area of your site can be a source for runoff | 
|  | + | (referred to as a ‘source area’). One or more of these areas | 
|  | + | should be targeted when introducing LID at your place of | 
|  | + | worship. | 
|  | + | ===Targeting hard surfaces=== | 
|  | + | Hard surfaces such as parking lots are a great opportunity to | 
|  | + | implement LID. Parking lots are the main source of runoff and | 
|  | + | represent the most significant source of stormwater pollutants | 
|  | + | coming from your site. | 
|  | + | Parking lots at places of worship are typically busy only on | 
|  | + | select days of the week when groups gather for prayer or | 
|  | + | other community activities. Due to this intermittent schedule, | 
|  | + | parking lots at these facilities are often rented for other | 
|  | + | purposes during times of low usage. On sites where peak | 
|  | + | demand does not approach the total capacity of the lot, | 
|  | + | consider reducing the parking surface. | 
|  | + | Retrofit options for these large parking lot areas include | 
|  | + | permeable pavement, bioswales and bioretention areas. | 
|  | + | A benefit of permeable pavement systems is that they often | 
|  | + | have a longer lifespan than conventional infrastructure. | 
|  | + | The freeze-thaw cycle of the Ontario climate is tough on | 
|  | + | pavement. Frost heaving and slumping can cause cracks and | 
|  | + | potholes because of the expansion and contraction of water. | 
|  | + | The expected lifespan for conventional asphalt pavement | 
|  | + | in a northern climate, such as Ontario, is approximately 15 to | 
|  | + | 20 years. A well-maintained porous asphalt system can last for | 
|  | + | over 30 years, and permeable interlocking concrete pavers | 
|  | + | can have a design life of 20 to 25 years or greater. | 
|  | + | Using LID techniques to manage stormwater can also | 
|  | + | eliminate or reduce the need for an on-site storm sewer | 
|  | + | system. By eliminating piping, failure points in the pavement, | 
|  | + | such as areas around catch basins and manholes, can be | 
|  | + | eliminated. A design that does not use storm sewers also | 
|  | + | negates the need to replace on-site piping, thereby saving | 
|  | + | long-term infrastructure replacement costs. | 
|  | + | Prefabricated modular infiltration chambers are gaining | 
|  | + | acceptance because they are easy to integrate with parking | 
|  | + | lot functions. These subsurface systems are typically installed | 
|  | + | over a coarse granular reservoir to provide water storage and | 
|  | + | allow infiltration into native soils. Infiltration chambers under | 
|  | + | conventional asphalt systems work well on sites where parking | 
|  | + | demand does not allow space for a stormwater feature. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Landscaped areas=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Landscaped or lawn areas adjacent to the parking lot or | 
|  | + | building present opportunities for implementation of LID | 
|  | + | practices such as bioswales and bioretention areas. These | 
|  | + | areas typically accept runoff from nearby hard surfaces and | 
|  | + | provide water quality and water balance benefits. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Roof options=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Rainwater harvesting systems can be simple or complex | 
|  | + | depending on the architecture and roof drainage patterns of | 
|  | + | your building. Many places of worship have peaked roofs with | 
|  | + | piping to convey water from the rooftop. If your site is set up | 
|  | + | this way, it can be easy to integrate harvesting systems into | 
|  | + | the landscape surrounding your building. | 
|  | + | Roof runoff can also be directed to soakaways located on | 
|  | + | passive use areas around your building. Due to the relatively | 
|  | + | good quality of this runoff, pre-treatment devices are not | 
|  | + | required. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Source Areas=== | 
|  | + | The LID option that best fits your site will depend what types | 
|  | + | of source areas are present. Types of source areas include: | 
|  | + | * Active use area | 
|  | + | * Passive use area | 
|  | + | * Pedestrian walkway | 
|  | + | * Internal driveway | 
|  | + | * Parking lot | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | On park sites, pollution prevention is often associated with | 
|  | + | changes to operations and maintenance practices and has | 
|  | + | not been included in Table 6.3.1. An aerial photo of a park | 
|  | + | with each of these source areas accompanies Table 6.3.1. | 
|  | + | Options and implementation strategies for a few of these | 
|  | + | source areas will give you some ideas for your park site. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | The scale | 
|  | + | of your LID retrofit project will largely determine how you will | 
|  | + | proceed. You can usually complete | 
|  | + | small-scale LID projects with in-house expertise and | 
|  | + | resources. Large-scale projects will require external support | 
|  | + | from consultants and contractors. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Small-scale projects=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Starting with small-scale projects is a good strategy to | 
|  | + | increase interest within your community, determine if | 
|  | + | support is available from stakeholder groups and gain retrofit | 
|  | + | experience. Small-scale projects include retrofitting your | 
|  | + | property with landscape alternatives, rain barrels or using | 
|  | + | pollution prevention strategies and practices. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Small-scale projects require few resources and a | 
|  | + | small project budget because: | 
|  | + | * They do not require integration into capital works projects | 
|  | + | * Engineering consultants are not required | 
|  | + | * Contractors are not required | 
|  | + | * External approvals are not required | 
|  | + | * Consultation with the public is limited | 
|  | + | Due to the less significant financial commitment, it can be | 
|  | + | easier to build the case for support for small-scale projects. | 
|  | + | A successful small-scale LID retrofit project on your property | 
|  | + | is a good indication that you are ready to take on a more | 
|  | + | intensive retrofit project. You now know the resources that Large-scale projects | 
|  | + | Large-scale projects require significantly more effort, budget, | 
|  | + | and staff than small-scale projects. Large-scale LID retrofits | 
|  | + | include: | 
|  | + | * Bioretention | 
|  | + | * Enhanced grass swales | 
|  | + | * Bioswales | 
|  | + | * Perforated pipe systems | 
|  | + | * Permeable pavement | 
|  | + | * Soakaways | 
|  | + | * Infiltration chambers | 
|  | + | * Rainwater harvesting (excluding rain barrels) | 
|  | + | * Prefabricated modules | 
|  | + | * Green roofs | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Consider a large-scale project if your place of worship is | 
|  | + | striving to be a community leader in sustainability. Large-scale | 
|  | + | projects are often highly visible and attract more public | 
|  | + | attention. They may also be the only solution | 
|  | + | to site-specific challenges, like poor drainage. Before starting | 
|  | + | a large-scale retrofit project consider the distinctions that set | 
|  | + | these retrofits apart from small-scale projects. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Integration with long-term infrastructure replacement and rehabilitation plans=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Most large-scale LID retrofits must function with existing | 
|  | + | site infrastructure, such as storm sewers, catch basins, | 
|  | + | and pavement systems. The construction of large-scale | 
|  | + | LID practices often requires these systems to be removed, | 
|  | + | exposed, or replaced. The best time for this type of project is when an infrastructure replacement or rehabilitation | 
|  | + | project is already planned. | 
|  | + | Maintenance programs and budgets that take into consideration | 
|  | + | the expected life cycle of critical site components, including | 
|  | + | parking lot and roofs, are valuable resources for large-scale | 
|  | + | projects. If the replacement of these features is forecasted in | 
|  | + | your site budget well in advance, asses if it is advantageous | 
|  | + | to incorporate LID retrofits into these projects. Remember, | 
|  | + | sharing construction materials, construction equipment, staff | 
|  | + | resources, and time will reduce the budget for your retrofit. | 
|  | + | For example, installing bioretention, infiltration chambers, | 
|  | + | or permeable pavement in a parking lot will require the | 
|  | + | existing pavement to be removed. Budget and resources that | 
|  | + | have been set aside for a parking lot replacement could be | 
|  | + | transferred to the LID retrofit project. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Involvement of consultants and contractors=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Consultants are required for large-scale retrofit projects, | 
|  | + | specifically for the final screening of options, pre-design, | 
|  | + | detailed design, tender and contract documents, construction | 
|  | + | supervision and administration, and assumption and | 
|  | + | verification.  | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Site contractors are also required for large-scale LID retrofits. | 
|  | + | Contractors should be pre-qualified based on previous | 
|  | + | experience with similar LID projects. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | External approvals | 
|  | + | Large-scale retrofits may require a variety of approvals at the | 
|  | + | municipal, watershed, provincial, and/or federal level. | 
|  | + | Since LID is still relatively new, you may encounter policies | 
|  | + | or bylaws that present barriers to LID retrofit projects. | 
|  | + | Alternatively, the municipality may have to amend or enforce | 
|  | + | some policies and bylaws to facilitate the implementation of | 
|  | + | LID projects on your site. | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | {| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center;" |  | {| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center;" | 
| Line 403: | Line 576: | 
|  | |style="text-align: left;" |Building || * || * || * || ** || ** || * || ** || o || o || * |  | |style="text-align: left;" |Building || * || * || * || ** || ** || * || ** || o || o || * | 
|  | |} |  | |} | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===stuff to maybe integrate into the above=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | '''Figure 6.3.1: When considering any parking lot retrofit, first determine if the parking spaces provided are consistent with the''' | 
|  | + | demand. In place of worship, the demand will fluctuate. (Source: CVC) | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | '''Did you know that green roofs can help''' | 
|  | + | reduce your heating and cooling costs? | 
|  | + | These systems absorb heat and act as | 
|  | + | insulators for buildings. It has been estimated | 
|  | + | that a 3,000 m2 green roof on a one story | 
|  | + | building in Toronto could reduce the cost of | 
|  | + | cooling a building in the summer by 6% and | 
|  | + | the cost of heating a building by 10% in the | 
|  | + | winter23. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | [[Category: Planning]] |  | [[Category: Planning]] |