| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | [[File:Bioretention_Planters_1.jpeg|thumb|[[Stormwater planters]] beautify this building entrance. The entrance receives a lot of traffic during business hours, making it an ideal location for a high visibility LID practice. (Source: Aquafor Beech)]] | | [[File:Bioretention_Planters_1.jpeg|thumb|[[Stormwater planters]] beautify this building entrance. The entrance receives a lot of traffic during business hours, making it an ideal location for a high visibility LID practice. (Source: Aquafor Beech)]] |
| | | | |
| − | [[Permeable paving]] is also an option in large municipal parking lots. Pervious concrete, permeable interlocking concrete pavers, and porous asphalt can detain stormwater and increase infiltration. | + | [[Permeable pavements]] are also an option in large municipal parking lots. Pervious concrete, permeable interlocking concrete pavers, and porous asphalt can detain stormwater and increase infiltration. |
| | | | |
| | Municipal facilities provide excellent opportunities for integrating [[rainwater harvesting]] systems. Rainwater harvesting systems have two requirements: an area for catchment of relatively clean runoff and a nearby demand for water usage. Municipal facilities often have large rooftop areas producing relatively clean runoff. Installing a cistern internal to the building or buried adjacent to the building can provide a sustainable source of water for site irrigation needs for landscaped areas, recreational fields and indoor use (e.g. flushing toilets and urinals). | | Municipal facilities provide excellent opportunities for integrating [[rainwater harvesting]] systems. Rainwater harvesting systems have two requirements: an area for catchment of relatively clean runoff and a nearby demand for water usage. Municipal facilities often have large rooftop areas producing relatively clean runoff. Installing a cistern internal to the building or buried adjacent to the building can provide a sustainable source of water for site irrigation needs for landscaped areas, recreational fields and indoor use (e.g. flushing toilets and urinals). |
| Line 19: |
Line 19: |
| | | | |
| | === Targeting pollution prevention opportunities === | | === Targeting pollution prevention opportunities === |
| − | On some municipal sites, pollution prevention techniques and strategies outlined in Chapter 2 are the best approaches to mitigating the environmental impact of your site. Retrofits of municipal works yards require a different approach than other land uses discussed in this guide. Works yards do not offer substantial opportunities for public interaction. LID retrofits should focus primarily on reducing pollution generated on-site. Fuelling stations, waste storage areas, truck washing stations, sand and salt storage, staging areas and water conveyance features are ideal for | + | On some municipal sites, [[Pollution prevention|pollution prevention]] techniques and strategies are the best approaches to mitigating the environmental impact of your site. Retrofits of municipal works yards require a different approach than other land uses discussed in this guide. Works yards do not offer substantial opportunities for public interaction. LID retrofits should focus primarily on reducing pollution generated on-site. Fueling stations, waste storage areas, truck washing stations, sand and salt storage, staging areas and water conveyance features are ideal for pollution prevention. |
| − | pollution prevention. | |
| | | | |
| | === Source areas === | | === Source areas === |
| Line 37: |
Line 36: |
| | (** = Common, * = Possible, o = Unusual) | | (** = Common, * = Possible, o = Unusual) |
| | ! Source area | | ! Source area |
| − | ! [[Permeable pavement]] | + | ! [[Permeable pavements]] |
| | ! [[Bioretention]] | | ! [[Bioretention]] |
| | ! [[Enhanced grass swales]] / [[Bioswales|bioswales]] | | ! [[Enhanced grass swales]] / [[Bioswales|bioswales]] |
| | ! [[Green roofs]] | | ! [[Green roofs]] |
| − | ![[Soakaways, Infiltration Trenches and Infiltration Chambers Guide| Soakaways]] and [[Infiltration trenches|infiltration trenches]] | + | ! Soakaways and [[Infiltration chambers|infiltration chambers]] |
| | ! [[Exfiltration trenches|Perforated pipe systems]] | | ! [[Exfiltration trenches|Perforated pipe systems]] |
| | ! [[Rainwater harvesting]] | | ! [[Rainwater harvesting]] |
| Line 60: |
Line 59: |
| | |style="text-align: left;" |Building || * || * || * || ** || ** || * || ** || o || o || ** | | |style="text-align: left;" |Building || * || * || * || ** || ** || * || ** || o || o || ** |
| | |} | | |} |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Small-scale projects===
| |
| − | Starting with small-scale projects is a good strategy to
| |
| − | increase public interest in LID practices, gauge municipal
| |
| − | support, and gain retrofit experience. Small-scale projects
| |
| − | include retrofitting your site with landscape alternatives or rain
| |
| − | barrels, enhancements of existing swales, or using pollution
| |
| − | prevention strategies and practices.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Small-scale projects require fewer resources and require a
| |
| − | smaller project budget because:
| |
| − | * They do not require integration into capital works projects
| |
| − | * Engineering consultants are not required
| |
| − | * Contractors may not be required
| |
| − | * External approvals are not required
| |
| − | * Consultation with the public is limited
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Due to this smaller financial commitment, it can be easier
| |
| − | to build colleague and supervisor support for small-scale
| |
| − | projects.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[Pollution prevention|Pollution prevention (P2)]] projects are great
| |
| − | small-scale projects for municipal facilities
| |
| − | like public works yards. To learn more about
| |
| − | implementing P2 on your site, '''refer to the case studies on Armstrong Manufacturing Inc, Bernardi Building Supply Ltd. and Unifay-Fedar Investments in Appendix B.'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Many P2 techniques and strategies do not require
| |
| − | construction, consultants or contractors. Adding signage to a
| |
| − | site is a simple and easy to implement pollution prevention at
| |
| − | municipal facilities.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | A successful small-scale LID retrofit project on your municipal
| |
| − | site is a good indication that you are ready to take on a more
| |
| − | intensive retrofit project. You now know the resources that are
| |
| − | available and understand the internal municipal processes
| |
| − | required to move a LID project from planning to finished
| |
| − | product.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Large-scale projects===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Large-scale projects require significantly more effort, budget,
| |
| − | and staff than small-scale projects. Large-scale LID retrofits
| |
| − | include:
| |
| − | * Bioretention
| |
| − | * Enhanced grass swales
| |
| − | * Bioswales
| |
| − | * Perforated pipe systems
| |
| − | * Permeable pavement
| |
| − | * Soakaways
| |
| − | * Infiltration chambers
| |
| − | * Rainwater harvesting (excluding rain barrels)
| |
| − | * Prefabricated modules
| |
| − | * Green roofs
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Consider a large-scale project if your municipality or
| |
| − | department would like to be a leader in sustainability. Large-scale
| |
| − | projects are often highly visible and attract more public
| |
| − | attention. Large-scale projects may also be the only solution
| |
| − | to site-specific challenges. For example, if site infrastructure
| |
| − | is at risk as a result of urban flooding, LID practices that detain
| |
| − | large volumes of runoff and encourage infiltration are the
| |
| − | most viable LID options.
| |
| − | Before starting a large-scale retrofit project, consider the
| |
| − | following distinctions that set these retrofits apart from small-scale
| |
| − | projects.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Integration with capital works programs===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Most large-scale LID retrofits must function with existing
| |
| − | site infrastructure, such as storm sewers, catch basins,
| |
| − | and pavement systems. The construction of large-scale
| |
| − | LID practices often requires these systems to be removed,
| |
| − | exposed, or replaced. The best time for this type of project to
| |
| − | occur is when an infrastructure replacement or rehabilitation
| |
| − | project is already planned.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | When LID retrofits are worked into other construction
| |
| − | projects, such as parking lot repaving, or grading or drainage
| |
| − | improvements, there can be substantial cost savings.
| |
| − | Whether big or small, every municipality spends relatively
| |
| − | large sums of money and substantial time planning for
| |
| − | major capital projects. This includes redevelopment of public
| |
| − | building and spaces. Many communities who have undertaken
| |
| − | retrofits recognize that even if a relatively small portion of the
| |
| − | project funds goes towards LID retrofits, they can retrofit large
| |
| − | impervious surfaces and avoid new stormwater management
| |
| − | infrastructure projects17.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Municipal facility rehabilitation is typically forecast well in
| |
| − | advance of the project. Parking lot paving is typically worked
| |
| − | into municipal budgets based on expected life cycle and
| |
| − | observed wear. As such, funds may be set aside prior to
| |
| − | the project planning phases. Long-term forecast budgets
| |
| − | may also be available for site revitalizations or expansions.
| |
| − | These budget forecasts provide opportunities to compare the
| |
| − | capital and life-cycle costs and benefits of the conventional
| |
| − | construction project and LID retrofit.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Involvement of consultants and contractors===
| |
| − | Consultants are required for large-scale retrofit projects,
| |
| − | specifically for the final screening of options, pre-design,
| |
| − | detailed design, tender and contract documents, construction
| |
| − | supervision and administration, and assumption and
| |
| − | verification.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Site contractors are also required for large-scale LID retrofits.
| |
| − | Ideally, contractors should be pre-qualified based on previous
| |
| − | experience with similar LID projects.
| |
| − | Remember, the contractor with the lowest bid
| |
| − | does not necessarily deliver the best product.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===More intensive public consultation===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Stakeholders must be closely involved in the retrofit process
| |
| − | for large-scale LID projects. These projects have longer
| |
| − | construction windows, may have significant impacts on long-term
| |
| − | public use patterns of the site, and will cost significantly
| |
| − | more taxpayer dollars.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Gaining public insight in advance of LID implementation can
| |
| − | help address public concerns and information gaps, as well as identify public supporters and champions. Public consultation
| |
| − | can help designers tailor the project to address community
| |
| − | concerns and values. Consultation can also help the design
| |
| − | team integrate the LID practice into the site’s landscape.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===External approvals===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Large-scale retrofits may require a variety of approvals at the
| |
| − | municipal, watershed, provincial, and/or federal level.
| |
| − | Since LID is still relatively new, you may encounter policies
| |
| − | or bylaws that present barriers to LID retrofit projects.
| |
| − | Alternatively, the municipality may have to amend or enforce
| |
| − | some policies and bylaws to facilitate the implementation of
| |
| − | LID projects on your site.
| |
| | | | |
| | [[Category:Planning]] | | [[Category:Planning]] |