| Line 54: | Line 54: | 
|  | |0||99.999%||99.999%||colspan = "3" style="text-align: center;"|Outside of the scope of the CSA standard |  | |0||99.999%||99.999%||colspan = "3" style="text-align: center;"|Outside of the scope of the CSA standard | 
|  | |} |  | |} | 
| − | <h3>Source Water Quality</h3>
 | + | ===Source Water Quality=== | 
|  | A study of many types of roof surfaces in Texas found: |  | A study of many types of roof surfaces in Texas found: | 
|  | *'Cool' membrane, concrete tile, and metal roofs all produced water of similar good quality for non-potable use, |  | *'Cool' membrane, concrete tile, and metal roofs all produced water of similar good quality for non-potable use, | 
|  | *The runoff water from asphalt shingle and green roofs contained significantly more dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The DOC can add a  yellow colour to the water. If the water is treated with chlorine, for drinking purposes, DOC can produce toxic compounds<ref>Mendez CB, Klenzendorf JB, Afshar BR, et al. The effect of roofing material on the quality of harvested rainwater. Water Res. 2011;45(5):2049-2059. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.015.</ref>. |  | *The runoff water from asphalt shingle and green roofs contained significantly more dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The DOC can add a  yellow colour to the water. If the water is treated with chlorine, for drinking purposes, DOC can produce toxic compounds<ref>Mendez CB, Klenzendorf JB, Afshar BR, et al. The effect of roofing material on the quality of harvested rainwater. Water Res. 2011;45(5):2049-2059. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.015.</ref>. | 
| − | Research in Hamilton, ON assessed the water quality of rain collected from three highly reflective 'cool roof' membranes<ref>Gong K,Wu Q, Peng S, Zhao X, Wang X.Research on the characteristics ofthe water quality ofrainwater runoff from green roofs.Water Sci Technol.2014;70(7).</ref>. Key findings: | + | Research in Hamilton, ON assessed the water quality of rain collected from three highly reflective 'cool roof' membranes<ref>Breda, N.J.J. 2003. Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. J. Exp. Bot. 54(392): 2403–2417. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg263.</ref>. Key findings: | 
|  | *The water was free from significant contamination with by-products of plastic manufacture and did not show elevated levels of the five metals tested.   |  | *The water was free from significant contamination with by-products of plastic manufacture and did not show elevated levels of the five metals tested.   | 
|  | *Increased microbiological contamination was found in runoff from roof areas where ponding occurred. |  | *Increased microbiological contamination was found in runoff from roof areas where ponding occurred. | 
|  | Note: Increased microbiological contamination in roof runoff is also associated with warmer weather <ref>Vialle C, Sablayrolles C, Lovera M, Jacob S, Huau MC, Montrejaud-Vignoles M. Monitoring of water quality from roof runoff: Interpretation using multivariate analysis. Water Res. 2011;45(12):3765-3775. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.029.</ref>. |  | Note: Increased microbiological contamination in roof runoff is also associated with warmer weather <ref>Vialle C, Sablayrolles C, Lovera M, Jacob S, Huau MC, Montrejaud-Vignoles M. Monitoring of water quality from roof runoff: Interpretation using multivariate analysis. Water Res. 2011;45(12):3765-3775. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.029.</ref>. |