| Line 1: | Line 1: | 
|  | [[File:Kortright-farm-june-2011.jpg|thumb|Wetlands fed by stormwater at Kortright Farm, Vaughan ON]] |  | [[File:Kortright-farm-june-2011.jpg|thumb|Wetlands fed by stormwater at Kortright Farm, Vaughan ON]] | 
| − |   | + | {{TOClimit|2}} | 
|  | ==Overview== |  | ==Overview== | 
|  | Free-water surface flow wetlands are most commonly employed for stormwater treatment and are similar to [[SWM ponds]] in function and design The most significant difference is the extent to which they are designed to incorporate shallow zones for wetland [[plants]]. A facility is normally characterized as a wetland if shallow zones (<0.5 m deep) make up more than 70 % of its volume.   |  | Free-water surface flow wetlands are most commonly employed for stormwater treatment and are similar to [[SWM ponds]] in function and design The most significant difference is the extent to which they are designed to incorporate shallow zones for wetland [[plants]]. A facility is normally characterized as a wetland if shallow zones (<0.5 m deep) make up more than 70 % of its volume.   | 
| Line 60: | Line 60: | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | ==Design== |  | ==Design== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Sizing free-water=== | 
|  | {| class="wikitable" |  | {| class="wikitable" | 
|  | |+Design parameters for free-water surface flow wetlands <ref name="TRCA">Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), and CH2M Hill Canada. 2018. Inspection and Maintenance Guide for Stormwater Management Ponds and Constructed Wetlands (T van Seters, L Rocha, and K Delidjakovva, Eds.).</ref> |  | |+Design parameters for free-water surface flow wetlands <ref name="TRCA">Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), and CH2M Hill Canada. 2018. Inspection and Maintenance Guide for Stormwater Management Ponds and Constructed Wetlands (T van Seters, L Rocha, and K Delidjakovva, Eds.).</ref> | 
| Line 149: | Line 151: | 
|  | |} |  | |} | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| − | ===Modeling=== | + | ===Modeling sub-surface=== | 
|  | '''[http://www.unep.or.jp/Ietc/Publications/Water_Sanitation/SubWet2/index.asp SubWet 2.0]''' is a modeling tool for <u>sub-surface flow wetlands</u> (both 100% constructed and naturalized/adapted). It can be used to simulate removal of nitrogen (including nitrogen in ammonia, nitrate and organic matter), phosphorus and BOD<sub>5</sub> in mg/l and the corresponding removal efficiencies (in %). Although the model has been calibrated already with data from cold and warm climates, users can further calibrate and validate it using local data observations. |  | '''[http://www.unep.or.jp/Ietc/Publications/Water_Sanitation/SubWet2/index.asp SubWet 2.0]''' is a modeling tool for <u>sub-surface flow wetlands</u> (both 100% constructed and naturalized/adapted). It can be used to simulate removal of nitrogen (including nitrogen in ammonia, nitrate and organic matter), phosphorus and BOD<sub>5</sub> in mg/l and the corresponding removal efficiencies (in %). Although the model has been calibrated already with data from cold and warm climates, users can further calibrate and validate it using local data observations. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ==Materials== | 
|  | + | ===Planting=== | 
|  | + | See [[Wetlands: Plants]] | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | ==Performance== |  | ==Performance== | 
| Line 174: | Line 180: | 
|  | *[https://cawt.ca/ Centre for Advancement of Water and Wastewater Technologies at Fleming College] |  | *[https://cawt.ca/ Centre for Advancement of Water and Wastewater Technologies at Fleming College] | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | + | ===Articles for review=== | 
|  | + | #Kennedy, G., and T. Mayer. 2002. Natural and Constructed Wetlands in Canada: An Overview. Water Qual. Res. J. Canada 37(2): 295–325. doi: 10.2166/wqrj.2002.020. | 
|  | + | #Bendoricchio, G., L. Dal Cin, and J. Persson. 2000. Guidelines for free water surface wetland design. EcoSys Bd 8: 51–91. http://www.pixelrauschen.de/wet/design.pdf (accessed 9 May 2018). | 
|  | ---- |  | ---- | 
| − | Kennedy, G., and T. Mayer. 2002. Natural and Constructed Wetlands in Canada: An Overview. Water Qual. Res. J. Canada 37(2): 295–325. doi: 10.2166/wqrj.2002.020.
 |  |