| Line 61: | Line 61: | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | [[File:Figure 4.3.7 (G-to-G Public Lands).JPG|Options and implementation strategies for a few of these source areas will give you some ideas for a park site.]] |  | [[File:Figure 4.3.7 (G-to-G Public Lands).JPG|Options and implementation strategies for a few of these source areas will give you some ideas for a park site.]] | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Small-scale projects=== | 
|  | + | Starting with small-scale projects is a good strategy to | 
|  | + | increase public interest in LID practices, gauge municipal | 
|  | + | support, and gain retrofit experience. Small-scale projects | 
|  | + | include retrofitting your site with landscape alternatives or rain | 
|  | + | barrels, enhancements of existing swales, or using pollution | 
|  | + | prevention strategies and practices. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Small-scale projects require fewer resources and require a | 
|  | + | smaller project budget because: | 
|  | + | * They do not require integration into capital works | 
|  | + | projects | 
|  | + | * Engineering consultants are not required | 
|  | + | * Contractors may not be required | 
|  | + | * External approvals are not required | 
|  | + | * Consultation with the public is limited | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Due to this smaller financial commitment, it can be easier | 
|  | + | to build colleague and supervisor support for small-scale | 
|  | + | projects. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | [[Pollution prevention|Pollution prevention (P2)]] projects are great | 
|  | + | small-scale projects for municipal facilities | 
|  | + | like public works yards. To learn more about | 
|  | + | implementing P2 on your site, '''refer to the case studies on Armstrong Manufacturing Inc, Bernardi Building Supply Ltd. and Unifay-Fedar Investments in Appendix B.''' | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Many P2 techniques and strategies do not require | 
|  | + | construction, consultants or contractors. Adding signage to a | 
|  | + | site is a simple and easy to implement pollution prevention at | 
|  | + | municipal facilities. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | A successful small-scale LID retrofit project on your municipal | 
|  | + | site is a good indication that you are ready to take on a more | 
|  | + | intensive retrofit project. You now know the resources that are | 
|  | + | available and understand the internal municipal processes | 
|  | + | required to move a LID project from planning to finished | 
|  | + | product. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Large-scale projects=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Large-scale projects require significantly more effort, budget, | 
|  | + | and staff than small-scale projects. Large-scale LID retrofits | 
|  | + | include: | 
|  | + | * Bioretention | 
|  | + | * Enhanced grass swales | 
|  | + | * Bioswales | 
|  | + | * Perforated pipe systems | 
|  | + | * Permeable pavement | 
|  | + | * Soakaways | 
|  | + | * Infiltration chambers | 
|  | + | * Rainwater harvesting (excluding rain barrels) | 
|  | + | * Prefabricated modules | 
|  | + | * Green roofs | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Consider a large-scale project if your municipality or | 
|  | + | department would like to be a leader in sustainability. Large-scale | 
|  | + | projects are often highly visible and attract more public | 
|  | + | attention. Large-scale projects may also be the only solution | 
|  | + | to site-specific challenges. For example, if site infrastructure | 
|  | + | is at risk as a result of urban flooding, LID practices that detain | 
|  | + | large volumes of runoff and encourage infiltration are the | 
|  | + | most viable LID options. | 
|  | + | Before starting a large-scale retrofit project, consider the | 
|  | + | following distinctions that set these retrofits apart from small-scale | 
|  | + | projects. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Integration with capital works programs=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Most large-scale LID retrofits must function with existing | 
|  | + | site infrastructure, such as storm sewers, catch basins, | 
|  | + | and pavement systems. The construction of large-scale | 
|  | + | LID practices often requires these systems to be removed, | 
|  | + | exposed, or replaced. The best time for this type of project to | 
|  | + | occur is when an infrastructure replacement or rehabilitation | 
|  | + | project is already planned. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | When LID retrofits are worked into other construction | 
|  | + | projects, such as parking lot repaving, or grading or drainage | 
|  | + | improvements, there can be substantial cost savings. | 
|  | + | Whether big or small, every municipality spends relatively | 
|  | + | large sums of money and substantial time planning for | 
|  | + | major capital projects. This includes redevelopment of public | 
|  | + | building and spaces. Many communities who have undertaken | 
|  | + | retrofits recognize that even if a relatively small portion of the | 
|  | + | project funds goes towards LID retrofits, they can retrofit large | 
|  | + | impervious surfaces and avoid new stormwater management | 
|  | + | infrastructure projects17. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Municipal facility rehabilitation is typically forecast well in | 
|  | + | advance of the project. Parking lot paving is typically worked | 
|  | + | into municipal budgets based on expected life cycle and | 
|  | + | observed wear. As such, funds may be set aside prior to | 
|  | + | the project planning phases. Long-term forecast budgets | 
|  | + | may also be available for site revitalizations or expansions. | 
|  | + | These budget forecasts provide opportunities to compare the | 
|  | + | capital and life-cycle costs and benefits of the conventional | 
|  | + | construction project and LID retrofit. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===Involvement of consultants and contractors=== | 
|  | + | Consultants are required for large-scale retrofit projects, | 
|  | + | specifically for the final screening of options, pre-design, | 
|  | + | detailed design, tender and contract documents, construction | 
|  | + | supervision and administration, and assumption and | 
|  | + | verification.  | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Site contractors are also required for large-scale LID retrofits. | 
|  | + | Ideally, contractors should be pre-qualified based on previous | 
|  | + | experience with similar LID projects. | 
|  | + | Remember, the contractor with the lowest bid | 
|  | + | does not necessarily deliver the best product. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===More intensive public consultation=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Stakeholders must be closely involved in the retrofit process | 
|  | + | for large-scale LID projects. These projects have longer | 
|  | + | construction windows, may have significant impacts on long-term | 
|  | + | public use patterns of the site, and will cost significantly | 
|  | + | more taxpayer dollars. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Gaining public insight in advance of LID implementation can | 
|  | + | help address public concerns and information gaps, as well as identify public supporters and champions. Public consultation | 
|  | + | can help designers tailor the project to address community | 
|  | + | concerns and values. Consultation can also help the design | 
|  | + | team integrate the LID practice into the site’s landscape. | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | ===External approvals=== | 
|  | + |  | 
|  | + | Large-scale retrofits may require a variety of approvals at the | 
|  | + | municipal, watershed, provincial, and/or federal level. | 
|  | + | Since LID is still relatively new, you may encounter policies | 
|  | + | or bylaws that present barriers to LID retrofit projects. | 
|  | + | Alternatively, the municipality may have to amend or enforce | 
|  | + | some policies and bylaws to facilitate the implementation of | 
|  | + | LID projects on your site. | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | [[Category:Planning]] |  | [[Category:Planning]] |