| Line 61: |
Line 61: |
| | | | |
| | [[File:Figure 4.3.7 (G-to-G Public Lands).JPG|Options and implementation strategies for a few of these source areas will give you some ideas for a park site.]] | | [[File:Figure 4.3.7 (G-to-G Public Lands).JPG|Options and implementation strategies for a few of these source areas will give you some ideas for a park site.]] |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Small-scale projects=== |
| | + | Starting with small-scale projects is a good strategy to |
| | + | increase public interest in LID practices, gauge municipal |
| | + | support, and gain retrofit experience. Small-scale projects |
| | + | include retrofitting your site with landscape alternatives or rain |
| | + | barrels, enhancements of existing swales, or using pollution |
| | + | prevention strategies and practices. |
| | + | |
| | + | Small-scale projects require fewer resources and require a |
| | + | smaller project budget because: |
| | + | * They do not require integration into capital works |
| | + | projects |
| | + | * Engineering consultants are not required |
| | + | * Contractors may not be required |
| | + | * External approvals are not required |
| | + | * Consultation with the public is limited |
| | + | |
| | + | Due to this smaller financial commitment, it can be easier |
| | + | to build colleague and supervisor support for small-scale |
| | + | projects. |
| | + | |
| | + | [[Pollution prevention|Pollution prevention (P2)]] projects are great |
| | + | small-scale projects for municipal facilities |
| | + | like public works yards. To learn more about |
| | + | implementing P2 on your site, '''refer to the case studies on Armstrong Manufacturing Inc, Bernardi Building Supply Ltd. and Unifay-Fedar Investments in Appendix B.''' |
| | + | |
| | + | Many P2 techniques and strategies do not require |
| | + | construction, consultants or contractors. Adding signage to a |
| | + | site is a simple and easy to implement pollution prevention at |
| | + | municipal facilities. |
| | + | |
| | + | A successful small-scale LID retrofit project on your municipal |
| | + | site is a good indication that you are ready to take on a more |
| | + | intensive retrofit project. You now know the resources that are |
| | + | available and understand the internal municipal processes |
| | + | required to move a LID project from planning to finished |
| | + | product. |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Large-scale projects=== |
| | + | |
| | + | Large-scale projects require significantly more effort, budget, |
| | + | and staff than small-scale projects. Large-scale LID retrofits |
| | + | include: |
| | + | * Bioretention |
| | + | * Enhanced grass swales |
| | + | * Bioswales |
| | + | * Perforated pipe systems |
| | + | * Permeable pavement |
| | + | * Soakaways |
| | + | * Infiltration chambers |
| | + | * Rainwater harvesting (excluding rain barrels) |
| | + | * Prefabricated modules |
| | + | * Green roofs |
| | + | |
| | + | Consider a large-scale project if your municipality or |
| | + | department would like to be a leader in sustainability. Large-scale |
| | + | projects are often highly visible and attract more public |
| | + | attention. Large-scale projects may also be the only solution |
| | + | to site-specific challenges. For example, if site infrastructure |
| | + | is at risk as a result of urban flooding, LID practices that detain |
| | + | large volumes of runoff and encourage infiltration are the |
| | + | most viable LID options. |
| | + | Before starting a large-scale retrofit project, consider the |
| | + | following distinctions that set these retrofits apart from small-scale |
| | + | projects. |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Integration with capital works programs=== |
| | + | |
| | + | Most large-scale LID retrofits must function with existing |
| | + | site infrastructure, such as storm sewers, catch basins, |
| | + | and pavement systems. The construction of large-scale |
| | + | LID practices often requires these systems to be removed, |
| | + | exposed, or replaced. The best time for this type of project to |
| | + | occur is when an infrastructure replacement or rehabilitation |
| | + | project is already planned. |
| | + | |
| | + | When LID retrofits are worked into other construction |
| | + | projects, such as parking lot repaving, or grading or drainage |
| | + | improvements, there can be substantial cost savings. |
| | + | Whether big or small, every municipality spends relatively |
| | + | large sums of money and substantial time planning for |
| | + | major capital projects. This includes redevelopment of public |
| | + | building and spaces. Many communities who have undertaken |
| | + | retrofits recognize that even if a relatively small portion of the |
| | + | project funds goes towards LID retrofits, they can retrofit large |
| | + | impervious surfaces and avoid new stormwater management |
| | + | infrastructure projects17. |
| | + | |
| | + | Municipal facility rehabilitation is typically forecast well in |
| | + | advance of the project. Parking lot paving is typically worked |
| | + | into municipal budgets based on expected life cycle and |
| | + | observed wear. As such, funds may be set aside prior to |
| | + | the project planning phases. Long-term forecast budgets |
| | + | may also be available for site revitalizations or expansions. |
| | + | These budget forecasts provide opportunities to compare the |
| | + | capital and life-cycle costs and benefits of the conventional |
| | + | construction project and LID retrofit. |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Involvement of consultants and contractors=== |
| | + | Consultants are required for large-scale retrofit projects, |
| | + | specifically for the final screening of options, pre-design, |
| | + | detailed design, tender and contract documents, construction |
| | + | supervision and administration, and assumption and |
| | + | verification. |
| | + | |
| | + | Site contractors are also required for large-scale LID retrofits. |
| | + | Ideally, contractors should be pre-qualified based on previous |
| | + | experience with similar LID projects. |
| | + | Remember, the contractor with the lowest bid |
| | + | does not necessarily deliver the best product. |
| | + | |
| | + | ===More intensive public consultation=== |
| | + | |
| | + | Stakeholders must be closely involved in the retrofit process |
| | + | for large-scale LID projects. These projects have longer |
| | + | construction windows, may have significant impacts on long-term |
| | + | public use patterns of the site, and will cost significantly |
| | + | more taxpayer dollars. |
| | + | |
| | + | Gaining public insight in advance of LID implementation can |
| | + | help address public concerns and information gaps, as well as identify public supporters and champions. Public consultation |
| | + | can help designers tailor the project to address community |
| | + | concerns and values. Consultation can also help the design |
| | + | team integrate the LID practice into the site’s landscape. |
| | + | |
| | + | ===External approvals=== |
| | + | |
| | + | Large-scale retrofits may require a variety of approvals at the |
| | + | municipal, watershed, provincial, and/or federal level. |
| | + | Since LID is still relatively new, you may encounter policies |
| | + | or bylaws that present barriers to LID retrofit projects. |
| | + | Alternatively, the municipality may have to amend or enforce |
| | + | some policies and bylaws to facilitate the implementation of |
| | + | LID projects on your site. |
| | | | |
| | [[Category:Planning]] | | [[Category:Planning]] |