Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bioretention: Performance (view source)

Revision as of 21:17, 8 March 2018

2,901 bytes removed ,  7 years ago
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  +
'''STEP are conducting a review of performance for many BMP types throughout 2018. This content will be updated shortly.'''
   −
<table class="table-responsive">
+
{|class="wikitable sortable"
−
    <table class="table table-bordered">
+
|+ Performance of bioretention with internal water storage<ref>Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater. Water. 2014;6(4):1069-1099. doi:10.3390/w6041069.</ref>
−
        <caption><strong>Performance of bioretention with internal water storage<ref>Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater. Water. 2014;6(4):1069-1099. doi:10.3390/w6041069.</ref></strong></caption>
+
|-
−
        <tr class='success'>
+
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Location
−
            <th class="text-center">Location</th>
+
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Filter media composition
−
            <th class="text-center">Biomedia composition</th>
+
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Media depth (cm)
−
            <th class="text-center">Media depth (cm)</th>
+
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Internal water storage depth (cm)
−
            <th class="text-center">Internal water storage depth (cm)</th>
+
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|I/P ratio
−
            <th class="text-center">I/P*</th>
+
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Runoff volume reduction (%)
−
            <th class="text-center">Runoff volume reduction (%)</th>
+
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|TSS reduction (%)
−
            <th class="text-center">TSS reduction(%)</th>
+
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|TN reduction (%)
−
            <th class="text-center">TN reduction (%)</th>
+
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|TP reduction (%)
−
            <th class="text-center">TP reduction (%)</th>
+
|-
−
        </tr>
+
!Montréal<ref>Géhéniau N, Fuamba M, Mahaut V, Gendron MR, Dugué M. Monitoring of a Rain Garden in Cold Climate: Case Study of a Parking Lot near Montréal. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2015;141(6):4014073. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000836.</ref>
−
<tr><td class="text-center">Montréal<ref>Géhéniau N, Fuamba M, Mahaut V, Gendron MR, Dugué M. Monitoring of a Rain Garden in Cold Climate: Case Study of a Parking Lot near Montréal. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2015;141(6):4014073. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000836.</ref></td>
+
|88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM||180||150||47||97||99||99||99
−
            <td class="text-center">88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM</td>
+
|-
−
            <td class="text-center">180</td>
+
!Virginia<ref>DeBusk KM, Wynn TM. Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(9):800-808. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388.</ref>
−
            <td class="text-center">150</td>
+
|88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM||180||150||47||97||99||99||99
−
            <td class="text-center">47</td>
+
|-
−
            <td class="text-center">97</td>
+
!rowspan="4"|North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Asce AM, Hunt WF, Asce M. Underdrain Configuration to Enhance Bioretention Exfiltration to Reduce Pollutant Loads. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(11):1082-1091. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000437.</ref>
−
            <td class="text-center">99</td>
+
|rowspan="4"|96% sand, 4% fines||rowspan="2"|110||88||rowspan="2"|12||89||rowspan="4"|58||rowspan="4"|58||rowspan="4"|-10
−
            <td class="text-center">99</td>
+
|-
−
            <td class="text-center">99</td></tr>
+
|58||93
−
<tr><td class="text-center">Virginia<ref>DeBusk KM, Wynn TM. Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(9):800-808. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388.</ref></td>
+
|-
−
            <td class="text-center">88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM</td>
+
|rowspan="2"|96||72||rowspan="2"|13||98
−
            <td class="text-center">180</td>
+
|-
−
            <td class="text-center">150</td>
+
|42||100
−
            <td class="text-center">47</td>
+
|-
−
            <td class="text-center">97</td>
+
!North Carolina<ref>Li H, Sharkey LJ, Hunt WF, Davis AP. Mitigation of Impervious Surface Hydrology Using Bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland. J Hydrol Eng. 2009;14(4):407-415. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(407).</ref>
−
            <td class="text-center">99</td>
+
|loamy sand, 3% OM||120||60||20||99||-||-||-
−
            <td class="text-center">99</td>
+
|-
−
            <td class="text-center">99</td></tr>
+
!rowspan="2"|North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Hunt WF. Bioretention Performance in the Upper Coastal Plain of North Carolina. In: Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2008:1-10. doi:10.1061/41009(333)95.</ref>
−
<tr><td rowspan=4 class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Asce AM, Hunt WF, Asce M. Underdrain Configuration to Enhance Bioretention Exfiltration to Reduce Pollutant Loads. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(11):1082-1091. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000437.</ref></td>
+
|rowspan="2"|98% sand, 2% fines||90||30||12||90||-||-||-
−
        <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">96% sand, 4% fines</td>
+
|-
−
        <td rowspan=2 class="text-center">110</td>
+
|90||60||12||98||-||-||-
−
        <td class="text-center">88</td>
+
|-
−
        <td rowspan=2 class="text-center">12</td>
+
!rowspan="2"|North Carolina<ref>Passeport E, Hunt WF, Line DE, Smith RA, Brown RA. Field Study of the Ability of Two Grassed Bioretention Cells to Reduce Storm-Water Runoff Pollution. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2009;135(4):505-510. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000006.</ref>
−
        <td class="text-center">89</td>
+
|rowspan="2"|15% sand, 80% fines, 5% OM||60||45||68||-||-||54||63
−
        <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">58</td>
+
|-
−
        <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">58</td>
+
|90||75||68||-||-||54||58
−
        <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">-10</td></tr>
+
|}  
−
<tr><td class="text-center">58</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">93</td>
  −
        </tr>
  −
<tr><td rowspan=2 class="text-center">96</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">72</td>
  −
        <td rowspan=2 class="text-center">13</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">98</td>
  −
        </tr>
  −
<tr><td class="text-center">42</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">100</td>
  −
        </tr>
  −
<tr><td class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Li H, Sharkey LJ, Hunt WF, Davis AP. Mitigation of Impervious Surface Hydrology Using Bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland. J Hydrol Eng. 2009;14(4):407-415. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(407).</ref></td>
  −
            <td class="text-center">loamy sand, 3% OM</td>
  −
            <td class="text-center">120</td>
  −
            <td class="text-center">60</td>
  −
            <td class="text-center">20</td>
  −
            <td class="text-center">>99</td>
  −
            <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
            <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
            <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
        </tr>
  −
<tr><td rowspan=2 class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Hunt WF. Bioretention Performance in the Upper Coastal Plain of North Carolina. In: Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2008:1-10. doi:10.1061/41009(333)95.</ref></td>
  −
<td rowspan=2 class="text-center">98% sand, 2% fines</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">90</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">30</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">12</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">90</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
        </tr>
  −
<tr><td class="text-center">90</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">60</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">12</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">98</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
        </tr>
  −
<tr><td rowspan=2 class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Passeport E, Hunt WF, Line DE, Smith RA, Brown RA. Field Study of the Ability of Two Grassed Bioretention Cells to Reduce Storm-Water Runoff Pollution. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2009;135(4):505-510. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000006.</ref></td>
  −
<td rowspan=2 class="text-center">15% sand, 80% fines, 5% OM</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">60</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">45</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">68</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">54</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">63</td>
  −
        </tr>
  −
<tr><td class="text-center">90</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">75</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">68</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">-</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">54</td>
  −
        <td class="text-center">58</td>
  −
        </tr>
  −
    </table>
  −
  *Impervious/Pervious ratio, i.e. the area of catchment divided by surface area of the cell
  −
</table>
  −
====References====
  −
<em><references /></em>
  −
{{:Feedback}}
     −
<strong>For review</strong>
+
===For review===
 
*http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0000876 (pollutants)
 
*http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0000876 (pollutants)
 
*http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784413883.003 (maturation)
 
*http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784413883.003 (maturation)
Line 111: Line 49:  
*https://www.chijournal.org/C417 (undersized)
 
*https://www.chijournal.org/C417 (undersized)
 
*https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE%20THESIS%20FINAL.pdf (modified biomedia)
 
*https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE%20THESIS%20FINAL.pdf (modified biomedia)
 +
*http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/1/13/htm (cold climate)
 +
----
 +
[[Category: Performance]]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.trca.io/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1901...7232"

Navigation menu