| Line 1: | Line 1: | 
|  | + | {|class="wikitable" | 
|  | + | |+ Performance of bioretention with internal water storage<ref>Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater. Water. 2014;6(4):1069-1099. doi:10.3390/w6041069.</ref> | 
|  | + | |-  | 
|  | + | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Location | 
|  | + | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Filter media composition | 
|  | + | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Media depth (cm) | 
|  | + | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Internal water storage depth (cm) | 
|  | + | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|I/P* | 
|  | + | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Runoff volume reduction (%) | 
|  | + | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|TN reduction (%) | 
|  | + | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|TP reduction (%) | 
|  | + | |- | 
|  | + | !Montréal<ref>Géhéniau N, Fuamba M, Mahaut V, Gendron MR, Dugué M. Monitoring of a Rain Garden in Cold Climate: Case Study of a Parking Lot near Montréal. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2015;141(6):4014073. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000836.</ref> | 
|  | + | |88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM||180||150||47||97||99||99||99 | 
|  | + | !Virginia<ref>DeBusk KM, Wynn TM. Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(9):800-808. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388.</ref> | 
|  | + | |88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM||180||150||47||97||99||99||99 | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| − | <table class="table-responsive">
 |  | 
| − |     <table class="table table-bordered">
 |  | 
| − |         <caption><strong>Performance of bioretention with internal water storage<ref>Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater. Water. 2014;6(4):1069-1099. doi:10.3390/w6041069.</ref></strong></caption>
 |  | 
| − |         <tr class='success'>
 |  | 
| − |             <th class="text-center">Location</th>
 |  | 
| − |             <th class="text-center">Biomedia composition</th>
 |  | 
| − |             <th class="text-center">Media depth (cm)</th>
 |  | 
| − |             <th class="text-center">Internal water storage depth (cm)</th>
 |  | 
| − |             <th class="text-center">I/P*</th>
 |  | 
| − |             <th class="text-center">Runoff volume reduction (%)</th>
 |  | 
| − |             <th class="text-center">TSS reduction(%)</th>
 |  | 
| − |             <th class="text-center">TN reduction (%)</th>
 |  | 
| − |             <th class="text-center">TP reduction (%)</th>
 |  | 
| − |         </tr>
 |  | 
| − | <tr><td class="text-center">Montréal<ref>Géhéniau N, Fuamba M, Mahaut V, Gendron MR, Dugué M. Monitoring of a Rain Garden in Cold Climate: Case Study of a Parking Lot near Montréal. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2015;141(6):4014073. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000836.</ref></td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">180</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">150</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">47</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">97</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">99</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">99</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">99</td></tr>
 |  | 
| − | <tr><td class="text-center">Virginia<ref>DeBusk KM, Wynn TM. Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(9):800-808. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388.</ref></td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">180</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">150</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">47</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">97</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">99</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">99</td>
 |  | 
| − |             <td class="text-center">99</td></tr>
 |  | 
|  | <tr><td rowspan=4 class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Asce AM, Hunt WF, Asce M. Underdrain Configuration to Enhance Bioretention Exfiltration to Reduce Pollutant Loads. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(11):1082-1091. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000437.</ref></td> |  | <tr><td rowspan=4 class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Asce AM, Hunt WF, Asce M. Underdrain Configuration to Enhance Bioretention Exfiltration to Reduce Pollutant Loads. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(11):1082-1091. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000437.</ref></td> | 
|  |          <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">96% sand, 4% fines</td> |  |          <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">96% sand, 4% fines</td> | 
| Line 101: | Line 85: | 
|  |    *Impervious/Pervious ratio, i.e. the area of catchment divided by surface area of the cell |  |    *Impervious/Pervious ratio, i.e. the area of catchment divided by surface area of the cell | 
|  | </table> |  | </table> | 
| − | ====References====
 | + |   | 
|  | + |   | 
|  | + | ==References== | 
|  | <em><references /></em> |  | <em><references /></em> | 
| − | {{:Feedback}}
 | + |   | 
|  |  |  |  | 
|  | <strong>For review</strong> |  | <strong>For review</strong> |