| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''<h3>LID opportunities in parks</h3>'''
| + | #REDIRECT [[LID opportunities on public land]] |
| − | Parks range from simple parcels of municipal property to
| |
| − | complex outdoor recreational facilities that include parking,
| |
| − | sidewalks, trails, sports fields, field houses, operations
| |
| − | facilities, and washrooms. Each distinct area of your site can
| |
| − | be a source for runoff (referred to as a ‘source area’). These
| |
| − | areas should be targeted when introducing LID in your park.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''<h4>Targeting hard surfaces</h4>'''
| |
| − | Hard surfaces like parking lots and internal driveways are the
| |
| − | most obvious areas to target for both stormwater quality and
| |
| − | water balance improvements. These features produce more
| |
| − | runoff than any other area on your site. Water quality of runoff
| |
| − | from parking lots and driveways is typically more polluted
| |
| − | than other source areas. Common water quality concerns
| |
| − | include sand and salt from winter de-icing operations, and
| |
| − | hydrocarbons (gasoline) and metals from vehicle breakdowns
| |
| − | Runoff from vegetated areas of parks will be relatively
| |
| − | clean and more closely match the natural water balance.
| |
| − | On municipal park properties, hard surfaces are usually
| |
| − | located adjacent to pervious areas such as lawns, gardens or naturalized areas. [[File:Example.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|The bioretention area installed at O’Connor Park
| |
| − | in Mississauga is part of a stormwater management system
| |
| − | that treats parking lot runoff prior to discharging to a local
| |
| − | wetland. (Source: CVC)]]
| |
| − | This makes an ideal location for a LID
| |
| − | retrofit. Where grading allows, you can construct bioswales
| |
| − | and bioretention areas in these green areas to pre-treat water
| |
| − | prior to infiltration.
| |
| − | | |
| − | You can also design parking surfaces and internal roadways
| |
| − | as infiltration systems using permeable pavement. This retrofit
| |
| − | strategy can be combined with other LID practices.
| |
| − | A pedestrian pathway paved with permeable pavement
| |
| − | is another LID option for your park. They will reduce runoff
| |
| − | volumes and encourage on-site infiltration. Pervious pipes
| |
| − | are a viable option on many parks sites as well. They can be
| |
| − | an alternative to conventional conveyance systems such as
| |
| − | storm sewers. They encourage infiltration from hard surfaces
| |
| − | and can be used to convey water to other LID features.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''<h4>Accepting drainage from off-site areas</h4>'''
| |
| − | Does municipally owned land drain into your retrofit site? If
| |
| − | so, this is an opportunity to provide stormwater controls for
| |
| − | these areas.
| |
| − | Roads are the most common source of runoff from external
| |
| − | properties into parks. Treating municipal road runoff in a park
| |
| − | requires planning input from municipal roads department
| |
| − | staff. For these projects, the team must understand how all
| |
| − | roads activities, including winter maintenance and potential
| |
| − | roadwork, will affect the operation of LID practices in the park.
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''<h3>Inter-municipal transfer of funds</h3>'''
| |
| − | Integrating LID practices into the municipal stormwater
| |
| − | management framework may change how municipal funds are
| |
| − | managed. Traditional stormwater management maintenance
| |
| − | resources and funds may have to be transferred to
| |
| − | [[File:Example1.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|Urban parkettes may look small, but they have
| |
| − | the potential to treat a large surface area of road. Typical ratios
| |
| − | of impervious drainage area to bioretention range from 5:1 to
| |
| − | 15:1. (Source: CVC)]]
| |
| − | a more landscape-based stormwater management maintenance
| |
| − | program. Instead of infrequent but expensive stormwater
| |
| − | management pond sediment removal operations, time and
| |
| − | resources will be spent on more frequent but inexpensive
| |
| − | maintenance projects including pruning and weeding
| |
| − | bioretention practices or sweeping permeable pavement.
| |
| − | Municipalities generally have the required staff and
| |
| − | infrastructure within departments (e.g. arborist and
| |
| − | horticulturalists in parks departments) to manage the
| |
| − | maintenance of LID measures; however, funding this
| |
| − | maintenance may require a transfer of funding and additional
| |
| − | training.
| |