| Line 1: | Line 1: | 
| − | '''<h3>[[LID opportunitiesin parks]]</h3>'''  [[File:Example.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|The bioretention area installed at O’Connor Park
 | + | #REDIRECT [[LID opportunities on public land]] | 
| − | in Mississauga is part of a stormwater management system
 |  | 
| − | that treats parking lot runoff prior to discharging to a local
 |  | 
| − | wetland. (Source: CVC)]]
 |  | 
| − |   |  | 
| − | Parks range from simple parcels of municipal property to
 |  | 
| − | complex outdoor recreational facilities that include parking,
 |  | 
| − | sidewalks, trails, sports fields, field houses, operations
 |  | 
| − | facilities, and washrooms. Each distinct area of your site can
 |  | 
| − | be a source for runoff (referred to as a ‘source area’). These
 |  | 
| − | areas should be targeted when introducing LID in your park.
 |  | 
| − | <br><br>
 |  | 
| − | '''<h4>Targeting hard surfaces</h4>'''
 |  | 
| − | Hard surfaces like parking lots and internal driveways are the
 |  | 
| − | most obvious areas to target for both stormwater quality and
 |  | 
| − | water balance improvements. These features produce more
 |  | 
| − | runoff than any other area onyour site. Water quality of runoff
 |  | 
| − | from parking lots and driveways is typically more polluted
 |  | 
| − | than other source areas. Common water quality concerns
 |  | 
| − | include sand and salt from winter de-icing operations, and
 |  | 
| − | hydrocarbons (gasoline) and metals from vehicle breakdowns
 |  | 
| − | Runoff from vegetated areas of parks will be relatively
 |  | 
| − | clean and more closely match the natural water balance.
 |  | 
| − | On municipal park properties, hard surfaces are usually
 |  | 
| − | located adjacent to pervious areas such as lawns, gardens or naturalized areas. This makes an ideal location for a LID
 |  | 
| − | retrofit. Where grading allows, you can construct bioswales
 |  | 
| − | and bioretention areas in these green areas to pre-treat water
 |  | 
| − | prior to infiltration.
 |  | 
| − | You can also design parking surfaces and internal roadways
 |  | 
| − | as infiltration systems using permeable pavement. This retrofit
 |  | 
| − | strategy can be combined with other LID practices.
 |  | 
| − | A pedestrian pathway paved with permeable pavement
 |  | 
| − | is another LID option for your park. They will reduce runoff
 |  | 
| − | volumes and encourage on-site infiltration. Pervious pipes
 |  | 
| − | are a viable option on many parks sites as well. They can be
 |  | 
| − | an alternative to conventional conveyance systems such as
 |  | 
| − | storm sewers. They encourage infiltration from hard surfaces
 |  | 
| − | and can be used to convey water to other LID features.
 |  | 
| − | <br> <br>
 |  | 
| − | '''<h4>Accepting drainage from off-site areas</h4>'''  [[File:Example1.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|Urban parkettes may look small, but they have
 |  | 
| − | the potential to treat a large surface area of road. Typical ratios
 |  | 
| − | of impervious drainage area to bioretention range from 5:1 to
 |  | 
| − | 15:1. (Source: CVC)]]
 |  | 
| − |   |  | 
| − | Does municipally owned landdrain into your retrofit site? If
 |  | 
| − | so, this is an opportunity to provide stormwater controls for
 |  | 
| − | these areas.
 |  | 
| − | Roads are the most common source of runoff from external
 |  | 
| − | properties into parks. Treating municipal road runoff in a park
 |  | 
| − | requires planning input from municipal roads department
 |  | 
| − | staff. For these projects, the team must understand how all
 |  | 
| − | roads activities, including winter maintenance and potential
 |  | 
| − | roadwork, will affect the operation of LID practices in the park.
 |  | 
| − | <br><br>
 |  | 
| − | '''<h4>Inter-municipal transfer of funds</h4>''' Integrating LID practices into the municipal stormwater
 |  | 
| − | management framework may change how municipal funds are
 |  | 
| − | managed. Traditional stormwater management maintenance
 |  | 
| − | resources and funds may have to be transferred to a more landscape-based stormwater management maintenance program. Instead of infrequent but expensive stormwater management pond sediment removal operations, time and
 |  | 
| − | resources will be spent on more frequent but inexpensive maintenance projects including pruning and weeding bioretention practices or sweeping permeable pavement.
 |  | 
| − | Municipalities generally have the required staff and infrastructure within departments (e.g. arborist and horticulturalists in parks departments) to manage the maintenance of LID measures; however, funding this maintenance may require a transfer of funding and additional
 |  | 
| − | training. 
 |  | 
| − | The federal Gas Tax Fund (GTF) is another funding option for
 |  | 
| − | funding LID retrofits. This is a federal transfer that provides
 |  | 
| − | long term funding for municipalities to build and revitalize
 |  | 
| − | public infrastructure. Up to 30% of municipalities yearly GTF
 |  | 
| − | allotment can be used towards stormwater management.
 |  | 
| − | <br><br>
 |  | 
| − |   |  | 
| − | '''<h4>Source Areas</h4>'''  [[File:Example3.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|The road surface (left) contributes significantly
 |  | 
| − | more stormwater pollutants than the parkland area (right). To
 |  | 
| − | achieve maximum watershed benefit a designer could consider
 |  | 
| − | accepting runoff from this external area. (Source: CVC)]]
 |  | 
| − | The LID option that best fits your site will depend what types
 |  | 
| − | of source areas are present. Types of source areas include:
 |  | 
| − | • Active use area
 |  | 
| − | • Passive use area
 |  | 
| − | • Pedestrian walkway
 |  | 
| − | • Internal driveway
 |  | 
| − | • Parking lot
 |  | 
| − | On park sites, pollution prevention is often associated with
 |  | 
| − | changes to operations and maintenance practices and has
 |  | 
| − | not been included in Table 3.3.1. An aerial photo of a park
 |  | 
| − | with each of these source areas accompanies Table 3.3.1.
 |  | 
| − | Options and implementation strategies for a few of these
 |  | 
| − | source areas will give you some ideas for your park site.
 |  | 
| − | {| class="wikitable"
 |  | 
| − | |colspan="9" style="text-align: center;|'''[[LID Options for Parks]]'''
 |  | 
| − | |-
 |  | 
| − | | Source area || Permeable pavement || Bioretention || Enhanced grassed swales || Bioswales || Soakaways and infiltration chambers || Perforated pipe system || Landscape alternatives || Prefabricated modules
 |  | 
| − | |-
 |  | 
| − | | Active use area ||style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|* ||style="text-align: center;| o ||style="text-align: center;| o
 |  | 
| − | |-
 |  | 
| − | | Passive use area ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| **
 |  | 
| − | |-style="text-align: center;|
 |  | 
| − | | Pedestrian walkway || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| * || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|o
 |  | 
| − | |-
 |  | 
| − | | Internal driveway || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|o ||style="text-align: center;| *
 |  | 
| − | |-
 |  | 
| − | | Parking lot ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|**
 |  | 
| − |   |  | 
| − | |-
 |  | 
| − | !colspan="3" style="background:cyan; color:black"| '''** Common option'''
 |  | 
| − | !colspan="3" style="background: orange; color: black"|'''* Possible option'''
 |  | 
| − | !colspan="3" style="background: brown; color: white"|'''o Unlikely'''
 |  | 
| − |  |}
 |  | 
| − | '''<h3>[[Making it happen: Approaches to getting LID into parks]] </h3>'''
 |  | 
| − |   |  | 
| − | The scale of your LID project will largely determine how you
 |  | 
| − | will proceed. This guide provides two tiers of LID park retrofit
 |  | 
| − | projects. You can usually complete small-scale LID projects
 |  | 
| − | with in-house expertise and resources. Large-scale projects
 |  | 
| − | will require external support from consultants and contractors.
 |  | 
| − |   |  | 
| − | '''<h4>Small-scale projects</h4>''' [[File:Example4.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|A no-mow zone is a landscape alternative that
 |  | 
| − | does not require construction activities. (Source: Aquafor Beech)]]
 |  | 
| − | Starting with small-scale projects is a good strategy to
 |  | 
| − | increase public interest in LID practices, gauge municipal
 |  | 
| − | support, and gain experience. Small-scale projects include
 |  | 
| − | retrofitting your parks site with landscape alternatives or rain
 |  | 
| − | barrels, or using pollution prevention strategies and practices.<br>
 |  | 
| − | Small-scale projects require fewer resources and require a
 |  | 
| − | smaller project budget because:
 |  | 
| − | * They do not require integration into capital works projects
 |  | 
| − | * Engineering consultants are not required
 |  | 
| − | * Contractors may not be not required
 |  | 
| − | * External approvals are not required
 |  | 
| − | * Consultation with the public is limited
 |  | 
| − | Due to the less significant financial commitment, it can be
 |  | 
| − | easier to build colleague and supervisor support for small-scale
 |  | 
| − | projects.<br>
 |  | 
| − | Small-scale projects like landscape alternatives and pollution
 |  | 
| − | prevention may not be easily identified as LID practices by
 |  | 
| − | the public. Your project team should consider establishing
 |  | 
| − | educational signage to inform the public.<br>
 |  | 
| − | '''<h4>Large-scale projects</h4>'''
 |  | 
| − | Large-scale projects require significantly more effort, budget,
 |  | 
| − | and staff than small-scale projects. Large-scale LID projects
 |  | 
| − | include:
 |  | 
| − | *Bioretention
 |  | 
| − | * Enhanced grass swales
 |  | 
| − | * Bioswales
 |  | 
| − | * Perforated pipe systems
 |  | 
| − | * Permeable pavement
 |  | 
| − | * Soakaways
 |  | 
| − | * Infiltration chambers
 |  | 
| − | * Rainwater harvesting (excluding rain barrels)
 |  | 
| − | * Prefabricated modules <br>
 |  | 
| − | Consider a large-scale project if your municipality or
 |  | 
| − | department would like to be a leader in sustainability. Largescale
 |  | 
| − | projects are often highly visible and attract more public
 |  | 
| − | attention. Large-scale projects may also be the only solution to
 |  | 
| − | site-specific challenges. For example, if the parking lot on your
 |  | 
| − | site does not have existing stormwater controls, small-scale
 |  | 
| − | projects are not likely to fully achieve compliance with water
 |  | 
| − | quality and quantity objectives. Consider using an infiltration
 |  | 
| − | chamber or bioswale project to meet those objectives.
 |  | 
| − | Before starting a large-scale retrofit project, consider the
 |  | 
| − | following distinctions that set these retrofits apart from smallscale
 |  | 
| − | projects.<br>
 |  | 
| − | '''<h4>Integration with capital works programs</h4>'''
 |  | 
| − | Most large-scale LID retrofits must function with existing
 |  | 
| − | site infrastructure, such as storm sewers, catch basins,
 |  | 
| − | and pavement systems. The construction of large-scale
 |  | 
| − | LID practices often requires these systems to be removed,
 |  | 
| − | exposed, or replaced. The best time for this type of project to
 |  | 
| − | occur is when an infrastructure replacement or rehabilitation
 |  | 
| − | project is already planned.
 |  | 
| − | For example, installing bioretention, infiltration chambers,
 |  | 
| − | or permeable pavement in a parking lot requires removal of
 |  | 
| − | existing pavement. Budget and resources set aside for parking lot replacement could be transferred to a retrofit project that
 |  | 
| − | includes replacement of this infrastructure.<br>
 |  | 
| − | '''<h4>Involvement of consultants and contractors</h4>'''
 |  | 
| − | Consultants are required for large-scale retrofit projects,
 |  | 
| − | specifically for the final screening of options, pre-design,
 |  | 
| − | detailed design, tender and contract documents, construction
 |  | 
| − | supervision and administration, and assumption and
 |  | 
| − | verification. Site contractors are also required for large-scale LID retrofits.
 |  | 
| − | Ideally, contractors should be pre-qualified based on previous
 |  | 
| − | experience with similar LID projects.
 |  | 
| − | <br>
 |  | 
| − | '''<h4>More intensive public consultation</h4>'''
 |  | 
| − | Stakeholders must be closely involved in the retrofit process
 |  | 
| − | for large-scale LID projects. These projects have longer
 |  | 
| − | construction windows, may have significant impacts on longterm
 |  | 
| − | public use patterns of the park, and will cost significantly
 |  | 
| − | more taxpayer dollars.
 |  | 
| − | Gaining public insight in advance of LID implementation can
 |  | 
| − | help address public concerns and information gaps, as well as
 |  | 
| − | identify public supporters and champions. Public consultation
 |  | 
| − | can help designers tailor the project to address community
 |  | 
| − | concerns and values. [[File:Example5.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|When installing new parks equipment, consider whether the LID practices can be integrated into the design. Here a
 |  | 
| − | bioswale has been built into the landscape between a playground and sidewalk. (Source: CVC)]]
 |  | 
| − |   |  | 
| − | '''<h4>External approvals</h4>'''
 |  | 
| − | Large-scale park retrofits may require a variety of approvals
 |  | 
| − | at the municipal, watershed, provincial, and/or federal level.
 |  | 
| − | Since LID is still relatively new, you may encounter policies
 |  | 
| − | or bylaws that present barriers to LID retrofit projects.
 |  | 
| − | Alternatively, the municipality may have to enforce some
 |  | 
| − | policies and bylaws to facilitate the implementation of LID
 |  | 
| − | projects within parks. 
 |  | 
| − | <br>
 |  | 
| − | '''<h4>Next Steps</h4>'''
 |  | 
| − | After reading this chapter you should know how to select the
 |  | 
| − | right LID practice for your site. You should also be familiar
 |  | 
| − | with the details you need to consider before undertaking an
 |  | 
| − | LID retrofit.
 |  |